- #41 [george1977v5i], 24-01-02 21:10
- #42 [Willai], 24-01-02 21:59R.I.P.
- #43 [一縷炊煙], 24-01-02 22:06一路好走!優秀民族
-
- #44 [olddude], 24-01-02 22:16#39 狗口長不出象牙
- #45 [phil.ng], 24-01-02 23:03salute to JAL 空姐, 九十秒內完成切離
- #46 [開心溫柔鄉], 24-01-02 23:26#39
果班%$^£*!&
真係睇多眼都眼痛,咪9理佢哋就最岩 - #47 [一縷炊煙], 24-01-02 23:31叫得你大6豬兜梗有原因啦
- #48 [micromegamah], 24-01-02 23:43從機艙內畫面所見,
絕對係一個優越既民族。
完全沒有爭先恐後。 - #49 [416GTA905], 24-01-03 00:39
- #50 [micromegamah], 24-01-03 00:57似乎係軍機機師違反機場控制人員指示
最後修改時間: 2024-01-03 00:57:18 - #51 [lekin], 24-01-03 02:41:乘客張先生話大煙,氧氣罩無跌落
著火供氧氣?佢可能嚇親,返到屋企執濟香爐灰茶 - #52 [Dlbf], 24-01-03 06:36機組人員真係夠冷靜,唔係死傷數字一定唔止。
- #53 [alexanderkoo], 24-01-03 06:38It depends, people die of suffocation rather than direct burn during a fire. A fireman also uses his BA. Basically, compressed air rather than pure oxygen.(except for deep diving)
The number one casualty was Canary Island, one plane flying over the other at airport which had the wrong taxiway.(counting the wrong gate number)
最後修改時間: 2024-01-03 06:40:25 - #54 [Dlbf], 24-01-03 10:29架機已經land佐,機組人員只有一個任務,就係盡快疏散乘客,彈個氧氣罩出嚟做乜?等你吸下先走?
- #55 [Dlbf], 24-01-03 10:31我個人覺得今次事件,ANA呢班機嘅機組人員,應該要加許一下。
- #56 [eckochin], 24-01-03 10:33客機無人傷亡,算是奇蹟
- #57 [Dlbf], 24-01-03 10:39題外話,1985年 JAL 空難事件中,其中一位生還者後嚟係 JAL 任教,負責安全逃生之類,每一個當年入識 JAL 嘅機組人員,都由佢親自上課。
- #58 [浩男123], 24-01-03 10:55跌氧氣?會否導致爆炸我唔知,你會選擇戴氧氣?定係離開座位逃生?我個?留返俾你!
- #59 [micromegamah], 24-01-03 10:58JAL優秀空姐爭取黃金九十秒, 九十秒吸少少煙唔會死。
- #60 [Kelvinzy], 24-01-03 11:04直情可以入教科書
事實證明素質高可以救自己一命 - 下一頁 (3 of 6)
- 返回 ...
撞機那一刻
有片 ! 東京羽田機場 客機降落爆炸起火 ! 疑與海上保安廳飛機相撞 五死一重傷 !