- #61 [myml], 23-01-22 01:28
- #62 [fotheringay], 23-01-22 01:31Before going further you owe me first apology for wrongfully accusing me of using another identity.
Second apology will be required for challenging and attacking me why writing in English here.
English is my first language and there is no rule saying here in R33 that only Chinese is allowed.
Being too presumptuous is a common issue here.
最後修改時間: 2023-01-22 01:37:11 - #63 [myml], 23-01-22 02:07You can use simplified characters to respond, so it looks more like there are three people discussing
-
- #64 [myml], 23-01-22 02:14I have been here for many years, and I seldom see members discussing in English. I believe you are pretending on purpose, and you take my question as someone else's comment. This is the evidence that you show your tail
- #65 [myml], 23-01-22 02:26reply #62 fotheringay
That's the proof of your pretending - #66 [fotheringay], 23-01-22 02:31Being too presumptuous is a common issue here.
Put it this way, I have been here since 2008 which makes me much longer than you if you only ever have one user name. I did have different usernames in the past because I had been suspended by R33 due to political differences with previous Webmaster, Jacky. That said I always used one username at a time.
I began here with English writing and I intended to keep it that way. Occasionally I will use translation software to translate my English writing but always in Traditional Chinese, never with Simplified Chinese if I must address.
Again, I don't have to explain myself to you but for the benefit of doubt I give away more than you need to know.
Once again, you project your own thinking and behaviour to other people. Big misfortune.
Again, that's my observation by using the same sentence from the beginning.
Being too presumptuous is a common issue here.
最後修改時間: 2023-01-22 02:35:09 - #67 [myml], 23-01-22 02:34reply # #62 fotheringay
閣下感到羞愧嗎 ?? ( do you feel shame??) - #68 [fotheringay], 23-01-22 02:37The conventional wisdom of the internet: don’t feed the troll.
- #69 [myml], 23-01-22 02:40reply #66
this is what you say - #70 [dawnoflp], 23-01-25 14:33Cd同黑膠只係載體,所有聲音經過處理已經係失真,唔明樓主點解執着黑膠失真,如set up唔好可能唔靚聲,損耗係弱點,但正常情況下重播自然度,樂器質感飽滿度比Cd好,Cd冇set up問題
- #71 [myml], 23-01-25 21:32回應#70貼子..
你不明白我就解釋給你聽,我不是執着黑膠失真,而是數據證明 CD 相比黑膠唱片好,就是這麼簡單,
你提出的所為甚麼自然度,樂器質感,飽滿度, 這些都是你的個人感覺,
如你認為我說話不對,你大可以拿理據出來. - #72 [celestion], 23-01-25 22:02傻人發現
- #73 [myml], 23-01-25 22:08reply#72 為何你不用其他身份出現? 你分身之多,令人驚嘆..
最後修改時間: 2023-01-25 22:11:13 - #74 [dawnoflp], 23-01-25 22:32不如你解釋吓為何黑膠可死灰復燃。我又想向你學吓嘢,想知你黑膠系統何解會失真(你用甚麽唱盤,唱頭,唱放)
最後修改時間: 2023-01-25 22:39:55 - #75 [myml], 23-01-25 22:39reply # 74
你可以到這裡看看這些高質素的討論就會明白..
https://www.hiendy.com/hififorum/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=145105&extra=page%3D1&page=4 - #76 [dawnoflp], 23-01-25 23:23請問樓主:Cd載體所播放的聲音是否冇失真的聲音
- #77 [myml], 23-01-25 23:29reply #76
任何經過錄音再由音響器材重播的聲音,皆不可能100%還原,
你問 (Cd載體所播放的聲音是否冇失真的聲音)
這是一個偽命題,一個誤導音樂愛好者的問題 - #78 [dawnoflp], 23-01-25 23:39既然已存在咗失真呢嗰事實,又點會係偽命題,又何來誤導。一個音樂愛好者無論佢用乜嘢載體播放,用甚麽天價/入們器材甚致小形藍芽喇叭也可不亦樂乎
最後修改時間: 2023-01-25 23:51:38 - #79 [myml], 23-01-25 23:51reply #78
這個貼子是討論黑膠唱片是否比CD失真,不是討論甚麼也不會失真
閣下在這裡想討論甚麼 - #80 [myml], 23-01-25 23:55reply #78
你同意黑膠唱片比CD失真嗎,如果不同意,請拿出理據出來,否則請不要胡吹,好嗎 - 下一頁 (4 of 7)
- 返回 ...
There is a Chinese saying that things have nothing to do with you, and you don’t bother yourself. Do you think I just got on the Internet?