- #131 [myml], 23-02-18 00:33還有這個
- #130 [myml], 23-02-18 00:32不再和你這個小孩鬥嘴了,你拿不出理據自完其說,請繼續自說自話罷
- #129 [dawnoflp], 23-02-17 23:46好心提你唔好出樣,幫緊你喎,都比你鬧,你真係要睇醫生
-
- #128 [myml], 23-02-17 23:27reply #26
你雖然學識差,但很可笑 - #127 [myml], 23-02-17 23:24又是你這個分身2打6,你又想討論甚麼?
- #126 [dawnoflp], 23-02-17 23:07樓主做乜係#124出自己個樣呀!仲要傍邊d字話自己
- #125 [myml], 23-02-17 22:36讓我教教你,把這個貼子沉下去,就不會有那麼多人注意,
否則只有越來越多人觀看.. - #124 [myml], 23-02-17 22:03一唱一和這些低劣技倆真是笑死
- #123 [myml], 23-02-17 21:58還有這個發放不真實資料的會員
最後修改時間: 2023-02-17 22:03:57 - #122 [myml], 23-02-17 21:55delete
最後修改時間: 2023-02-17 21:57:07 - #121 [myml], 23-02-17 21:54沒有上來一點時間,又有一些分身出來把失真,發放虛假資料帶向黑膠唱片/老化方向討論,真是笑死,
你這個藏頭露尾之徒不感覺羞恥嗎? - #120 [八達通], 23-02-17 21:29如果計傻
我應該係最傻果個
黑膠中文廿幾蚊,英文三,四十蚊,我走去買cd(美版百幾,日版2佰幾)
貪佢收藏及播放都方便
依家黑膠中英3佰幾至5佰幾,英文百幾至2佰幾,本地版cd百幾,sa百幾至两佰幾,我又買黑膠多
因cd死得太多,甘耐既野未必買得返,再再再版又吾係果㨾野
黑膠吾好話隻碟,個盤over40年都吾死都播得 - #119 [celestion], 23-02-17 13:08118, widepanel c hing
絕對正確, 聽黑膠唱片和CD是個人愛好, 無分彼此. - #118 [widepanel], 23-02-17 12:34此題材其實談來沒大意義.
玩得 HIFI 主要是個人喜好和聽感先入為主
LP 物理上是針行一次便磨蝕音溝一次沒錯.
CD 物理上是每過一秒透明層氧化和金屬反射層愈老化沒錯.
大家爭論什麼碟才可以聽幾十年, 到時大家耳朵可聽范圍早已經大幅下降亦沒錯.
如果只談物理最後大家無癮. 不如珍惜呢D時間玩自己鍾意嘅野開心最好 - #117 [myml], 23-02-14 07:54為何閣下不再回言?希望閣下不要再發放虛假資料出來,
因為這會誤導消費者,謝謝.. - #116 [myml], 23-02-11 13:07reply #113
還有,我不是要你拿出這個網站資料,是要閣下拿出CD只有8至10年壽命的理據或EMI發言人的名字,
我此刻就拿出你相同網站的資料,這個作者名叫 ( Michele Youket ) 是美國國會保護圖書館的專家, 你可以解釋她怎麼說嗎?
我使用中文回應你,就是希望其他網友也看得明白
https://www.vice.com/en/article/mg9pdv/the-hidden-phenomenon-that-could-ruin-your-old-discs
最後修改時間: 2023-02-11 13:10:11 - #115 [myml], 23-02-11 11:27reply#113
你提出的CD壽命只有8至10年的資料可否提供出來?? - #114 [myml], 23-02-11 11:03reply#113
我看見閣下在網上有測試音響器材,因此稱你為音響發燒友,人云亦云的意思是指你沒有對比就下結論,
在公共場所討論要有真憑實據,不能總是拿自己的感覺出來強加別人身上,閣下在這貼子偷換概念,
把(聽黑膠唱片是傻瓜嗎?) 討論問題轉變成 (聽黑膠唱片就是傻瓜)令人反感的問題,
加上你故意將(LP失真問題)轉變成(LP老化問題),這個就是重點了。要你拿出資料就是要你拿出證據證明LP不會失真,
LP不會老化,或者CD失真,CD很容易老化,就是這麼簡單。
你的所謂EMI研究資料,可否提供出來,
最後修改時間: 2023-02-11 11:04:24 - #113 [fotheringay], 23-02-11 08:10First and foremost I am no such 音響發燒友. 人云亦云? 貨色?? I am sorry that's not typical old Hong Kongers dialogue, right? Not sure what do you mean. Then again, I am no longer being seen as old Hongkonger either.
You didn't really read my previous messages, I don't compare all the different formats trying to find their merits or faults. If the music with them is what I enjoy I will have them in my cheap stereo system.
In fact I listen to youtube music a lot these days as there are many non-commercial releases that so rare and special.
"閣下的口中出來,沒有人這麼說,是你自說自話" Of course they are my words, my thought and what's wrong with them being constructed for discussion? This is not a definitive conclusion, but rather a proposal.
Your資料. What 資料? A chipped record you bought many years ago? Your own collection of CD's?
What I presented to you was research material from the industry. You still yet to bring out your findings to support your claim that the spokesman from EMI and the research from Nimbus were false. May I remind you that your claim could constitute a defamation lawsuit.
Nonetheless, I have come to conclusion that this "argument" will continue forever even CD's may be made obsolete. I wish you good luck and my contribution to this thread is now closed. - #112 [myml], 23-02-11 07:31我在這裡拿出的資料比你多,這裡的網友是看到的
- 下一頁 (1 of 7)
- 返回 ...