- #41 [0925], 16-09-30 09:52
- #42 [eCoeCo], 16-09-30 10:00
LC uses 50% recycled iron.
- #43 [堯軍], 16-09-30 10:56鐵鑛內嘅鑛石本身同樣充滿雜質,其中一種用高爐還原法將雜質分離係冶金學嘅常識,亦唔係咩高科技。
相信人哋做鑄鐵鍋同當年大躍進全民煉鋼係唔同水平 -
- #44 [cornercube], 16-09-30 11:13如果我E+要買 金屬 煲或鑊..
只買food grade不鏽鋼.
再$多, 買銅底不鏽鋼. - #45 [1398], 16-10-01 10:34IMO, Lodge 最好洗, 毫不留情大力擦就可以.
LC 隔層coating 著唔到鑄鐵效果 - #46 [0925], 16-10-01 11:06屋企有3個鑊,唔夠力拋鑊都想買個9LB 12" cast iron 的,不過見淘寶全國省市都有得賣即刻又縮咗,最怕買錯冒牌的。
最後修改時間: 2016-10-01 11:14:07 - #47 [eCoeCo], 16-10-01 11:26Lodge两用,又煲又Pan,幾舊水,抵玩。
- #48 [MinnaNoTabo], 16-10-01 11:51
- #49 [rickywongwwk], 16-10-01 12:27想在sogo 買,幾時有得減?
- #50 [0925], 16-10-01 12:46唔,這個 12" 的確好吸引(個 handle 如果長一點和粗一點就 perfect 喇),有冇減價反而不在考慮之列,rickywongwwk 師兄幾時做清兵? 我都想去試一試手感。
最後修改時間: 2016-10-01 12:47:51 - #51 [eCoeCo], 16-10-01 12:52柄再長D,除非你腕力驚人。
- #52 [0925], 16-10-01 13:10柄再長D,除非你腕力驚人。<
柄長一點唔駛揸咁貼個鑊邊應該冇咁熱,又可以好似打網球咁雙手握柄嘛,咁如果真係要講腕力就的確係比普通麻甩佬強一點!
最後修改時間: 2016-10-01 13:19:01 - #53 [rickywongwwk], 16-10-01 13:19$54 美金?
邊個website? - #54 [0925], 16-10-01 13:22
- #55 [eCoeCo], 16-10-01 13:27煲本身重近十磅,加埋盛載食物又另十幾磅,如流質食品更難單用長柄拿起,祇能同時用另一邊双手提起,再長柄儲存也不方便。
Cast iron 其实幾脆下,易断。
最後修改時間: 2016-10-01 13:30:44 - #56 [0925], 16-10-01 13:35Cast iron 其实幾脆下,易断。<
#50: (個 handle 如果長一點和粗一點就 perfect 喇) - #57 [dumbdumb], 16-10-01 13:43生鐵pan 真係唔知有乜咁神奇,我以前係加拿大都用㗎啦,十幾蚊個,仲平過易潔鑊,用佢只不過貪平
- #58 [eCoeCo], 16-10-01 13:51其实舊式瓦煲至好用!
- #59 [bliss33], 16-10-01 16:03銅煲有茅人用過呢?小時候屋企有過,嫌打理煩,掉咗
- #60 [rickywongwwk], 16-10-01 16:11
- 下一頁 (3 of 15)
- 返回 ...
呵欠。。。
Proposition 65 (formally titled "The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986") is a California law passed by direct voter initiative in 1986 by a 63%-37% vote. Its goals are to protect drinking water sources from toxic substances that may cause cancer and birth defects and to reduce or eliminate exposures to those chemicals generally, for example in consumer products, by requiring warnings in advance of those exposures.
Proposition 65 is administered by Cal/EPA's California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA).[1] Proposition 65 regulates substances officially listed by California as having a 1 in 100,000 chance of causing cancer over a 70-year period or birth defects or other reproductive harm in two ways. The first statutory requirement of Proposition 65 prohibits businesses from knowingly discharging listed substances into drinking water sources, or onto land where the substances can pass into drinking water sources. The second prohibits businesses from knowingly exposing individuals to listed substances without providing a clear and reasonable warning.
An official list of substances covered by Proposition 65 is maintained and made publicly available. Chemicals are added to or removed from the official list based on California's analysis of current scientific information. All substances listed show their known risk factors, a unique CAS chemical classification number, the date they were listed, and, if so, whether they have been delisted.[2]
Proposition 65 remains politically controversial even after 25 years, in large part because, in effect, it puts the burden of proof on business instead of government to make a key scientific determination about safety levels for specific toxic chemicals that the businesses are knowingly exposing members of the public to.[3] According to the California Environmental Protection Agency, "Proposition 65 has... increased public awareness about the adverse effects of exposures to listed chemicals.... [and] provided an incentive for manufacturers to remove listed chemicals from their products.... Although Proposition 65 has benefited Californians, it has come at a cost for companies doing business in the state."[4] The law has also been criticized for the proliferation of "bounty hunter" lawsuits. Attorneys have collected more than two-thirds of the money paid by businesses to settle Proposition 65 lawsuits since 2000.[5][6]
Proposition 65's effectiveness also remains controversial, with some pointing out the lack of any studies suggesting a decrease in cancer rates in the state.[7]
最後修改時間: 2016-09-30 09:58:07