- #39 [olivea88], 22-10-03 11:11阿婆夠60歲可以用2蚊車費啦,何必為慳錢用小童票?
- #38 [dumbdumb], 22-10-03 10:46當然乜可能都唔可以排除,阿婆亦有可能無車票,但係今時唔同往日,而家係有閘機有CCTV,除非阿婆跳閘或撞閘,我相信機會唔大囉,後生仔都唔係個個咁好身手。所以點解黨鐵唔告阿婆無車票而告使用小童票
- #37 [phil.ng], 22-10-03 09:36一定有其他內情丶幾十年前丶電車丶巴士都常有専人上車 check 票丶正常不過!交吾出票即被....., 有什麼奇?
-
- #36 [dumbdumb], 22-10-03 07:59咁黨鐵係正常嘅話,點解唔問佢交出有效車票?如果有問,應該係告佢冇有效車票而唔係告使用小童票?
- #35 [degalle], 22-10-03 02:00重有,冇透露最後有冇交罰款呀,交咗,人哋撤控亦平常,你細心睇多次啦,成篇嘢不盡不實
- #34 [degalle], 22-10-03 01:50蝦碌嘢喺劣正c內常有,捐地跌公司亦唔少,否則唔會常有摺軌塌閘啦^_^
- #33 [degalle], 22-10-03 01:47用咩名堂告佢係佢單方面講架炸,交唔出飛供查閱或使用唔合身分嘅飛都係違例,總之佢從來冇透露就係當場唔交出(唔肯交出或交唔出)張有效車飛毋須辯駁
- #32 [dttmtong], 22-10-03 01:00當場唔交出張有效地鐵飛供職員查驗,你拆掂呢個理由先啦
>> 既然當場交唔出,港鐵應該好似你咁講告佢唔提供有效地鐵飛。走去告-個無小童飛嘅人用小童飛,真係失策 - #31 [degalle], 22-10-03 00:52當場唔交出張有效地鐵飛供職員查驗,你拆掂呢個理由先啦。
我唔清楚所謂地鐵告呢個老母係透過民事訴訟追索車費/定額罰款或引用附例公訴佢違例,無論點,作為原告有權隨時中止訴訟 - #30 [dttmtong], 22-10-03 00:46搵青紅都拆唔掂呀
》港鐵蠃硬都唔告 - #29 [dttmtong], 22-10-03 00:45冇交出亦都係違附例,亦係可以開票
》咁呢家告乜嘢先? - #28 [degalle], 22-10-03 00:40搵青紅都拆唔掂呀
- #27 [degalle], 22-10-03 00:38咁你又睇唔睇到佢有張有效車票呀?由頭到尾都冇承認有及交出,冇交出亦都係違附例,亦係可以開票
- #26 [dttmtong], 22-10-03 00:30唔係事主點知咁多 detail
睇到嘅係小童飛都搵唔到,咁都重要告其實都無乜好講
另外舉證責任係邊方?呢個就真係倒轉黎
最後修改時間: 2022-10-03 00:32:02 - #25 [degalle], 22-10-03 00:23坐地鐵係代表乘客願意接受及遵守地鐵附例,為證清白唔係俾差人搜唔到有張細路飛,而係交出張有效及嘟咗該車程嘅成人票供職員查驗,咪倒轉嚟諗
- #24 [degalle], 22-10-03 00:18‘警方最後願意即場為其錄取口供及搜袋,證明母親並無持有小童票或小童八達通’
咁就代表呢個老母持有效車票?若有,點解唔擰出來俾職員嘟,一嘟咪知龍與鳳,搞咁多為乜?
冇有效車票同使用小童車票罰則及罰款有冇唔同? - #23 [dttmtong], 22-10-03 00:07‘警方最後願意即場為其錄取口供及搜袋,證明母親並無持有小童票或小童八達通’
- #22 [degalle], 22-10-02 22:58法例,例如賦與某伙權力去查核身分證,向司機要求吹波波,向你索閲開心出殯,你唔中意可唔可以拒絕?
- #21 [dennis815], 22-10-02 22:52“惟港鐵以無法證明該八達通屬於事主為由,拒絕承認該份證明文件”
港鐵老吹?
可以向法庭強制,出示不同車站cctv閉露電視,事主近日多次出入閘紀錄,證明該八達通屬事主 - #20 [degalle], 22-10-02 22:52本人並非鐵膠,對於該公司某年某日做過某d 事或冇做一d 事深惡痛絕,及慣常搾取不該利潤深惡痛絕,但一件事還一件事,各位要識得分清楚
- 下一頁 (3 of 4)
- 返回 ...