- #1 [iku000], 23-11-21 12:12
- #2 [大隻仔], 23-11-22 03:36依單嘢真係好爆,邊個放波入車?自殺定係教授殺?
邊個入d一氧化碳落個波度?如果係教授做既,動機係乜?
個女都唔放過?話殺蟲個個真係當人白癡! - #3 [alexanderkoo], 23-11-22 06:20In some cases, the court must need solid evidence, not exactly objective evidence. For homicide, would need corpse, weapon and DNA, better still motitvation. A DH murdered his employers in Shatin premises and fled to Phil. Repatriated from this country after a few years. Pleaded not guilty due to a "clean" job. In the States, husband murdered his wife, with footage of wife leaving home, classified as missing person after JR.
The other assistant professor from HKU should be innocent, in this context. The cable underneath bed was for tidy up package. Cable is not necessarily for electricity conduction. -
- #4 [dlbf], 23-11-22 11:45# 2 我記得被告有勳機嘅,佢有第三者之後搞離婚,唔想分身家。
- #5 [lym], 23-11-22 12:13咁都可以話個女有動機既。"眼冤"!
- #6 [一號2世], 23-11-22 12:32喺謀殺案件上,定罪一定要"毫無疑點",第一審我唔同意係"毫無疑點"
- #7 [lym], 23-11-22 12:51係未個女都好,現今世代,婚變難免。但最忌係爭,爭錢,爭養,爭樓。D細既好易會覺得自己先係拖衰既包袱。自己失敗吾好要D細既受!
最後修改時間: 2023-11-22 13:00:27 - #8 [bt99], 23-11-22 13:00有錢打到去終嬸停都非凡夫俗子,咁多年,趁大家都痴痴呆呆,前塵往事都唔記得哂,翻就翻囉,又唔係焗屎支角奇,豎蛋啦 .....
- 返回 ...
前中大醫學院副教授許金山,涉把注滿一氧化碳的瑜伽球放在私家車內,殺害妻女,於 2018 年被裁定兩項謀殺罪成,判囚終身。
許不服定罪提終極上訴,終院周二(21 日)頒下判詞,首席法官張舉能等 5 名法官一致裁定許上訴得直,撤銷其定罪,並下令將案件發還重審。許需繼續還押。