- #176 [一號2世], 19-06-28 18:16https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8CiUonJrwdg
- #175 [lym], 19-06-28 17:43Run!
Two-five boy
Run!
最後修改時間: 2019-06-28 17:47:48 - #174 [dna_oscar], 19-06-28 17:37
-
- #173 [Mercury2015], 19-06-27 21:50
- #172 [xsQsMe], 19-06-27 21:06
- #171 [伊雲士], 19-06-27 20:55理直氣壯!
- #170 [winning7], 19-06-27 20:51
- #169 [AndyTKO], 19-06-27 20:20
- #168 [GF777], 19-06-27 19:47.
- #167 [GF777], 19-06-27 19:36
- #166 [GF777], 19-06-27 19:36
- #165 [ovator], 19-06-27 19:16大家要齊心整靚本 Album
廣傳D靚相
黑警最驚被踢爆。
不要怨市民,怨柒鹅吧。
最後修改時間: 2019-06-27 19:23:17 - #164 [havefun], 19-06-27 19:12情況是否已經有點失控?好擔心民意逆轉!
- #163 [pharm], 19-06-27 18:41已經有字頭收阿爺order搞事。
- #162 [唔係阿化], 19-06-27 18:27For All Reference
https://www.police.gov.hk/offbeat/822/chi/f01.htm
醒目警察小貼士系列
出示委任證
(一)便衣人員與巿民接觸時,不論是否當值,在行使警察權力時,必須表明身分及出示委任證。(PGO 20-16)
(二)如市民提出要求,軍裝警務人員須出示委任證,除了三種情況。第一是「情況不容許」出示;或第二是「出示委任證會影響警隊行動及/或危及有關人員的安全」;或第三是「要求不合理」。(PGO 20-16)
(三)市民提出要求時,警務人員要運用判斷力,衡量有關要求是否合理。他須顧及整體情況,並隨時準備證明他的決定是有理據的。各人員須明白一項大致的原則,規定軍裝人員須出示委任證,是為了一個特定的目的──證明該人員是一名獲正式委任的警務人員,因而有執法的權力。引伸下來,若某些環境因素能合理地對某人員是否正式委任的警務人員構成懷疑,市民要求軍裝人員出示委任證,便應被視為一項合理的要求。例如 :有關人員當時並非穿著標準的制服,或者,他須要進入私人處所執行職務。
(四)訂定警務人員須出示委任證這規定並非為了滿足市民的好奇心,亦並非為了給不合作的人,提供一個便捷的途徑,讓他們阻礙警務人員合法執行職務。雖然如此,在某些情況之下,即使人員的警察身分不存在任何合理疑點,市民的要求仍可被視為合理的。各人員須時刻靈活處理,並依據優質服務的原則辦事。
(五)軍裝人員在上文第(二)題第一及第二的情況下,未能按要求出示委任證,人員其後待情況許可,便應即時出示委任證。(PGO 20-16)
(六)如警務人員未能出示委任證,而原因是「要求不合理」或最終未能遵辦,人員必須在記事冊說明原因。(PGO 20-16)
(七)如由一隊軍裝人員執行任務,例如在查核牌照期間,如市民提出要求,只需其中一名人員按要求出示委任證便可。(PGO 20-16)
(本系列由投訴及內部調查科提供) - #161 [唔係阿化], 19-06-27 18:26#160
明白, thx!
即係當黑警混入示威者中, 只要佢地無"行使警察權力", 巿民無權要求黑警出示委任證
只當黑警"行使警察權力"如查市民身份証時,市民先有權要求黑警出示委任證
頂!即明知係黑警,都做唔到D咩! - #160 [mcdull], 19-06-27 17:46#157
>呢d一直係警民共悉的規舉....今日先有疑問?
我遊行咁多次又真係未知有呢啲共識.
而你所quote既都係啱, 行駛警權要委任證, 亦需要在執勤時帶在身上 (並非必要主動展示). - #159 [raywong777], 19-06-27 17:41
- #158 [cow], 19-06-27 17:39about laser
class 1 and 2 should be safe, it is not easy and common to have class 3 or above, must be some specific devices, e.g. medical purpose, cutting, etc.
Correct me if I am wrong
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser
Lasers are usually labeled with a safety class number, which identifies how dangerous the laser is:
Class 1 is inherently safe, usually because the light is contained in an enclosure, for example in CD players.
Class 2 is safe during normal use; the blink reflex of the eye will prevent damage. Usually up to 1 mW power, for example laser pointers.
Class 3R (formerly IIIa) lasers are usually up to 5 mW and involve a small risk of eye damage within the time of the blink reflex. Staring into such a beam for several seconds is likely to cause damage to a spot on the retina.
Class 3B can cause immediate eye damage upon exposure.
Class 4 lasers can burn skin, and in some cases, even scattered light can cause eye and/or skin damage. Many industrial and scientific lasers are in this class.
The indicated powers are for visible-light, continuous-wave lasers. For pulsed lasers and invisible wavelengths, other power limits apply. People working with class 3B and class 4 lasers can protect their eyes with safety goggles which are designed to absorb light of a particular wavelength.
Infrared lasers with wavelengths longer than about 1.4 micrometers are often referred to as "eye-safe", because the cornea tends to absorb light at these wavelengths, protecting the retina from damage. The label "eye-safe" can be misleading, however, as it applies only to relatively low power continuous wave beams; a high power or Q-switched laser at these wavelengths can burn the cornea, causing severe eye damage, and even moderate power lasers can injure the eye.
Lasers can be a hazard to both civil and military aviation, due to the potential to temporarily distract or blind pilots. See Lasers and aviation safety for more on this topic.
Cameras based on charge-coupled devices may actually be more sensitive to laser damage than biological eyes.
最後修改時間: 2019-06-27 17:41:20 - #157 [winning7], 19-06-27 17:36
行使警權先需要出示委任證, 並唔係做緊公務就要委任證.
大家都知警察海關有民牌(車牌), 係未行駛警權時用來隱藏身分.
TBB膠劇都睇得多, 扮情侶, 扮小販, 到action時就戴証拉人.
(上文例子並非行使警權) >>>
揖捕疑犯當然可以扮臥底....可以理解
但走入示威人群中都不同捉賊的場景和危險性
呢d一直係警民共悉的規舉....今日先有疑問?
2. 只要擬進行的工作不妨礙人員妥為保管委任證,警務人員在任何時候均須隨身攜帶委任證。便衣人員不論是否當值,在與巿民接觸和行使警察權力時,必須表明身分及出示委任證。在案發現場的便衣人員,須將委任證掛在顯眼的地方,讓人易於辨認其身分。
3. 便衣警務人員不論是否當值,在進入警察樓宇時,均須出示委任證並掛在外衣上,而在該等樓宇逗留期間,亦須一直掛上委任證。 4. 如市民提出要求,軍裝警務人員應出示委任證,除非: (a) 情況不容許;或 (b) 出示委任證會影響警隊行動及/或危及有關人員的安全;或 (c) 要求不合理。
https://www.police.gov.hk/info/doc/pgo/tc/Cpgo021.pdf
最後修改時間: 2019-06-27 17:37:20 - 下一頁 (1 of 9)
- 返回 ...