- #41 [alec6266], 16-03-17 12:39讀書時我傾向共和黨,直到大概2005-6年我轉舦因爲薯仔總統真係越做越衰,共和黨亦越來越黑人憎。Trump我一定吾會投佢但Clinton我都吾太喜歡。我幾想Sanders嬴但應該無可能;所以係無得揀之下都只係會投Clinton.
- #42 [scriptwriter], 16-03-17 13:57共和黨根本冇一個簡得落手,乾脆直接讓比民主黨繼續算九數啦
- #43 [alec6266], 16-03-17 14:17#42...我同意. 我只係覺得Rubio OK,起碼吾樣衰但係佢吾爭氣,無計。不過我張票都係會投比民主黨,盡盡公民義務。
-
- #44 [joeyd], 16-03-17 14:20當要用刪除法去選擇時,尼個地方都好大鑊。
睇我地香港特狗當年就知。 - #45 [alec6266], 16-03-17 15:06joeyd C-Hing你講得啱。共和黨候選人真係無個揀得落手;民主黨2揀一都係無得好揀;吾同2008年Obama同Clinton2揀一好揀好多。我成日覺得Hilary Clinton had her choice in 2008;佢吾應該今次再選,不過可能2008年吾係right timing喇
- #46 [issac_chan], 16-03-17 16:04聽講係facebook成立至今share得最多的facebook post:
Humans of New York
14 March at 23:44 ·
An Open Letter to Donald Trump:
Mr. Trump,
I try my hardest not to be political. I’ve refused to interview several of your fellow candidates. I didn’t want to risk any personal goodwill by appearing to take sides in a contentious election. I thought: ‘Maybe the timing is not right.’ But I realize now that there is no correct time to oppose violence and prejudice. The time is always now. Because along with millions of Americans, I’ve come to realize that opposing you is no longer a political decision. It is a moral one.
I’ve watched you retweet racist images. I’ve watched you retweet racist lies. I’ve watched you take 48 hours to disavow white supremacy. I’ve watched you joyfully encourage violence, and promise to ‘pay the legal fees’ of those who commit violence on your behalf. I’ve watched you advocate the use of torture and the murder of terrorists’ families. I’ve watched you gleefully tell stories of executing Muslims with bullets dipped in pig blood. I’ve watched you compare refugees to ‘snakes,’ and claim that ‘Islam hates us.’
I am a journalist, Mr. Trump. And over the last two years I have conducted extensive interviews with hundreds of Muslims, chosen at random, on the streets of Iran, Iraq, and Pakistan. I’ve also interviewed hundreds of Syrian and Iraqi refugees across seven different countries. And I can confirm— the hateful one is you.
Those of us who have been paying attention will not allow you to rebrand yourself. You are not a ‘unifier.’ You are not ‘presidential.’ You are not a ‘victim’ of the very anger that you’ve joyfully enflamed for months. You are a man who has encouraged prejudice and violence in the pursuit of personal power. And though your words will no doubt change over the next few months, you will always remain who you are.
Sincerely,
Brandon Stanton
1,078,026 shares
最後修改時間: 2016-03-17 16:04:52 - #47 [LBiA], 16-03-17 16:17> 我成日覺得Hilary Clinton had her choice in 2008
個時可能係同啲民主黨大老有secret deal,2008 side step 比obama,
今次咪撐返佢,老美選舉一樣要好多錢同關係 - #48 [Guizuhk], 16-03-17 16:38換dt就好似國民黨換柱咁
有排都救唔番 - #49 [milano], 16-03-17 21:38巔佬做左總統全球風險評估
Analysis
Thus far Mr Trump has given very few details of his policies - and these tend to be prone to constant revision - but a few themes have become apparent. First, he has been exceptionally hostile towards free trade, including notably NAFTA, and has repeatedly labelled China as a "currency manipulator". He has also taken an exceptionally right-wing stance on the Middle East and jihadi terrorism, including, among other things, advocating the killing of families of terrorists and launching a land incursion into Syria to wipe out IS (and acquire its oil). In the event of a Trump victory, his hostile attitude to free trade, and alienation of Mexico and China in particular, could escalate rapidly into a trade war - and at the least scupper the Trans-Pacific Partnership between the US and 11 other American and Asian states signed in February 2016. His militaristic tendencies towards the Middle East (and ban on all Muslim travel to the US) would be a potent recruitment tool for jihadi groups, increasing their threat both within the region and beyond.
Conclusion
Although we do not expect Mr Trump to defeat his most likely Democratic contender, Hillary Clinton, there are risks to this forecast, especially in the event of a terrorist attack on US soil or a sudden economic downturn. It is worth noting that the innate hostility within the Republican hierarchy towards Mr Trump, combined with the inevitable virulent Democratic opposition, will see many of his more radical policies blocked in Congress - albeit such internal bickering will also undermine the coherence of domestic and foreign policymaking.
https://gfs.eiu.com/Article.aspx?articleType=gr&articleId=2876
最後修改時間: 2016-03-17 21:43:10 - #50 [sony], 16-03-17 22:11癲佬上場。世界大亂
- #51 [tabletalking], 16-03-18 08:55
癲佬上場
米田賴皮佬
南美種草佬
IS偽聖戰佬
金仔靠嚇佬
全部可望一鋪收皮 - #52 [敗家仔], 16-03-18 09:41邊個上場都係要聽後面既人話事
如果吾係分分鐘好似金奶滴 - #53 [Cadiver], 16-03-18 09:51你哋咪笑, DT 贏的機會太髙,如果個師奶做,以後四或八年美國整體唔會有太大起色或改彎, 如果DT做,就好難估計會發生啲乜樹, 以美國人的一般態度喜歡think out of the box, support DT 贏的機會實在太髙。佢做可能會搞反好花旗亦有可能PK, 但師奶做就一定無乜特別....
- #54 [alec6266], 16-03-18 10:04CADiver C-Hing,今日NPR All Things Considered講GOP裏邊有人想拉Trump落馬等佢就算係front runner都吾可以係7月做到共和黨代表。
- #55 [LBiA], 16-03-18 10:16
未做點講點玩點顛都得,
真係做咗又另一回事,
當日Bush senior 咪一樣Read my lips. - #56 [Cadiver], 16-03-19 12:34都講得岩,花旗今曰嘅政府系統根本就係做乜都唔得,所以真係邊個做都無交义所謂, 點都係唔得, 黑仔初頭記望夠髙啦,八年後亦都係無乜特別. 有佢嘅legacy但人民日曰嘅生活又有幾多好咗呢? 香港返派日日睇歐美真係都唔知睇乜。
- #57 [falcongate], 16-03-22 03:09Please, 呢條 donald trump 冇底線㗎,心術不正猶如 689,行事作風似強國土豪,點頂呀?
- #58 [milano], 16-03-22 04:16宜家共和黨係度鬼打鬼要搞掂 DT 睇嚟都係拉利做總統多
- #59 [浩男123], 16-03-22 07:10邊Q個做都一樣,相差唔會好大!總統權力有制
- #60 [浩男123], 16-03-22 07:11有制衡!唔同肥仔金同習總
- 下一頁 (3 of 36)
- 返回 ...