Any CHing here experiences with Angenieux LB3 lens?
Someone approach me with a LB3 50-200mm lens wonder its picture performance. Please help.

Regards

Angenieux 法國的浪漫。

老鏡玩都係志在玩味，如果平買當玩具，解像度極可能已追不上現在新D數碼 sensor。要實用就不如買番新D數碼鏡。

記得個名叫愛展能，以前啲譯名係好聽啲

好嘢來，而家只製造電影攝影鏡頭。


最後修改時間: 2020-08-06 11:53:50

愛斬人
吾係講笑，用佢影出黎既野係有電影feel
反差飽和度同色調吾係市場主流鏡頭比到你
係有種法式浪漫

的確係。

菲林就試過28-70 2.6 ，感覺唔太sharp。

Thank you to all CHings.
it is correct that the Angenieux sharpness is way far from cutting edge but abundant lot details comparing to main stream lens. Its low contrast and image transition is all missed from main stream lens.
I don't chase for cutting edge sharpness but long for image details and image transition. Regarding to resolution, many old lens still performs well. If you not poisoned by Kinoptik, old lens is not your cup of tea. and wonder I am an idiot.

Back to my question, is LB3 50-200 very heavy and hard to handle?

點handle呢d好個人既感覺
有d人係追求折磨既快感

既然都知道支鏡頭效果，系蒙太奇，睇價啫，平咪玩下囉！玩過後，又多樣野同人吹吹水！



最後修改時間: 2020-08-06 15:27:28

係就吾係sharp取向，但我相信支鏡又未至於蒙太奇，應該係柔向同歐洲色調。支鏡有 f3 光圈都吾會輕巧得去邊。

配現代單反或者冇反未必啱而且要轉接環
而鏡頭多數不能重現往日應有光芒
試過用德制Zeiss或Contax配新型的機但效果強差人意
又重又要手動對焦
多數最後會失望，賣番出去就搵人要
唯一可考慮既舊鏡祇有Leica M系列

http://forum.mflenses.com/please-show-us-your-biggest-baddest-zoom-t43975.html

呢度有一回貼有個用家話支鏡有 3383 gram 重。
（該貼寫 50-300 f3 應係 typo,佢貼支鏡上面係刻 50-200 1:3)

#1
最好試過先買.無論其他人點講,要你自己試過“愛”味先知是否你杯茶.N年前想買 Nikon mount,覺得太貴唔值,not my cup of tea

最後修改時間: 2020-08-06 16:37:54

朦朧系列有som，不過多數八米釐鏡
detail得黎感覺清新有TH
A記果兩支有ai mount最熱門，你見過真身肯定會講有無搞錯，支膠鏡賣到咁貴