- #21 [Thanatos], 24-12-12 19:25
- #22 [olddude], 24-12-12 20:04#19 official dealer 會賣水貨?
- #23 [Spong], 24-12-13 19:49想當年「拉架」玩家買機多數去「萬成」佢哋門口個大飾櫃就已經擺滿晒!
雖然價錢未必最平但勝在「穩陣」行貨;而想慳啲買二手機就多數去老尖搵「陳炔」
想入「萬成」買Nikon/Canon,企門口位接待員會對你講:
先生唔該請直行到最入然後再轉右再轉左:-)
小弟當年屬「窮拉架買家」係人玩我又玩之流,入「萬成」仲要閃閃縮縮;
後來買下買下都買咗幾件,熟咗一位「主管」每次係咁以可以熟客價減幾舊水。
其實有不少「大富豪買家」買咗未必用嚟影相,祇返屋企㩒兩嘢快門就收埋;佢哋亦從來唔講價.
小弟當然唔到呢個級數,典會收埋等弟日陪葬咁笨;當然第日就即刻去「東昇」買幾筒富士RVP50四圍咁攞景。 -
- #24 [spong], 24-12-13 19:51^_^。Zeiss zm 15/2.8+ M6
最後修改時間: 2024-12-13 19:55:48 - #25 [spong], 24-12-13 19:52揸「拉架」佢先肯擺甫士
^—^
Summilux 35/ 1.4 pre.
最後修改時間: 2024-12-13 19:56:57 - #26 [Thanatos], 24-12-13 21:02我自己就轉左用Hasselblad, Leica可能淨係去旅行先會帶,兩部M11P同埋十幾支鏡頭長期安放防潮箱內
點解Hasselblad咁正?除咗sensor size大好多之外,Hasselblad 嘅 Natural Color Solution 、16 bit color depth 同埋佢嘅dynamic range (話就話兩者都係15 stops) 贏Leica幾條街
我自己用Apple電腦(XDR display)加Lightroom執相,用Hasselblad影嘅相,一開 HDR (high dynamic range)出嚟嘅結果只可以用 jaw dropping 嚟形容,Leica影出嚟嘅相,做唔到咁嘅效果
有關於Hasselblad + Apple XDR display + Lightroom HDR選項全部加埋得出嚟嘅結果,好似冇人提過。呢個結果好似淨係可以喺畫面度做到出嚟,若果將相片打印又或者轉用jpg輸出已經即刻冇晒嗰種動態震撼感
我唔敢想像,如果用 EIZO ColorEdge CG3146會再震撼多幾多倍。淨係呢樣嘢,我每次揀相機都好自然攞起部Hasselblad
無可否認Hasselblad嘅鏡頭又唔夠Leica鏡頭咁有立體感同埋咁少distortion (尤其是wide鏡嘅barrel distortion)所以我冇賣套Leica - #27 [fotheringay], 24-12-13 21:38@Thanatos,
Which Hasselblad are you using? X2D 100C or 907X & CFV 100C?
Have you thought of Fuji or had compared already, same sensor, also good glasses but cheaper?
I hired the Fuji GFX50s and some Canon lenses for my Scotland holiday.
I was impressed. From my point of view I think Fuji suits me more.
最後修改時間: 2024-12-13 21:53:53 - #28 [audiofan], 24-12-13 21:39請教各師兄, 以前買落嘅菲林相機,二手市場如何? 有套 Hasselblad 500CM 及两支鏡 80mm, 100mm, 全套用咗都唔夠五次。另一套系 Contax RTSII 及幾支镜,15mm Distagon, 35mm PC, 100mm Macro, 全部西德镜。 而家騙案多,唔知喺邊度放好!
- #29 [Thanatos], 24-12-13 23:35Chi gor,
I have both X2D and 907X CFV100C
The former for functionality. The latter purely for its classical appearance.
Besides, my canine friends find waist-level shooting less intrusive. - #30 [Thanatos], 24-12-13 23:38#28 audiofan 兄
如果你仲想影相,咁不如買CFV100C digital back,可以用返你手頭上嘅器材 - #31 [fotheringay], 24-12-13 23:46Thanatos Hing,
OMG!! Very nice and I do envy enormously with admiration !!!!
One day I will have the 907X & CFV 100C.......dream on!!!
With the tilt viewfinder I think some GFX could also have a waist level view.
最後修改時間: 2024-12-13 23:59:28 - #32 [fotheringay], 24-12-14 00:16The original file size of my pictures are around 6768 x 4512 px. I upload to Flickr to 2500 x 1527 px as it would look better with bigger picture.
Unfortunately, Flickr would only allow me to to show 2048 x 1251 px because I am just using it free.
The Fuji GFX50s I used to take these pictures is old and has only 50mp and I wonder what would Fuji 100s or Hasselblad CFV 100C could do!!!! - #33 [Spong], 24-12-14 09:38#28
哈蘇500c 就算擺度唔用,快門制一樣會容易自動lock死,要修理,不過唔難,其他兩隻Zeiss鏡頭重身,雖然新淨但唔多值錢;
Contax 機身電子部分擺得耐一樣自動壞,而且冇得整。
三年前一批過推架手推車仔賣咗俾ssp 「東昇」
包括以下物品:
哈蘇500c(壞快門)加150/4及250/5.6鏡及magazine兩套;
Contax RTS三部(壞電子部份)加四支鏡,包括300/4 全部德國Zeiss做;
Rolleiflex 雙鏡f/2.8
Zeiss binocular德國做
以上大部份有原裝盒說明書8至9成新(誇張啲講9成新)
祇留一枝Contax 100mm/2加整套soft filter加原廠hood作紀念。
全部售價$24000。
。。。賣仔莫抓頭。。。 - #34 [Spong], 24-12-14 10:20近年已經少外映,本想一次過賣埋「拉架」攞番些少「棺材本」
但舊年祖囯出咗隻自動對焦M-Sony接環,外影方便咗,部機亦唔重,而且影像靚過Sony 鏡多多聲,所以用住先,
況且「拉架」舊鏡有度好,唔會年年跌價,反而微升.
祖國產品有時唔錯。 - #35 [audiofan], 24-12-14 10:33#30 & 33 多謝兩位師兄意見, 三四十歲時,誤父損友,人買我買, 當年還周圍走去揾西德製造 Contax 鏡!跟本唔太好?影,好多时人地話買黎托咩,拿套野出街,真系内心明白苦笑!! 眨眼幾十年,依家腰酸骨痛,更加唔会拎去街,只留它在放防潮箱。 再擺落去都冇意思,所以請師兄介紹有邊間可信二手店賣咗算數,明白賣仔莫摸頭! 叫做擁有過喇! 唉!
- #36 [Spong], 24-12-14 11:39細仔壹年前學玩相機,今次以為啲舊嘢可以「薪火相傳」
佢玩咗一個月,結果都係皮幾嘢自己買咗套Olympus;
佢仲話:用「拉架」out out哋,真吹脹! - #37 [audiofan], 24-12-14 12:15人地講,十个拿拉假(名廠机),九个唔識影相,我系其中一个! 拉假轉過幾手,对上知道系猶太人手。廿年前,已把M4, M6 及例牌鏡组合賣哂!因喜欢西德制 Zeiss 鏡自然色彩!
- #38 [navigim], 24-12-14 12:32當年幫博士生買十皮拉架,有28% staff discount
- #39 [Thanatos], 24-12-14 13:04論色彩,影出嚟顏色最靚嘅,唔係Leica,唔係Zeiss
係Rodenstock - #40 [audiofan], 24-12-14 13:51Rodenstock 好似冇乜consumer 級鏡。當年舊萬宜世界攝影個showcase 好似配專業機Linhoff 。
- 下一頁 (2 of 3)
- 返回 ...
至於「貨源」,有原廠封條,又有出廠日期,唔難分辨是否二手扮新機
假貨就更加唔會有可能,A貨冇咁嘅技術做到咁靚