- #41 [Wild_7], 06-03-29 18:32
- #42 [Myers], 06-03-29 18:57Not Dyna, it is something called Keswick Audio Research once carried by Ming Fat Hong which they translate the brandname to 'Kim See' (swordsman). I believe it use a Morel bass with 86.5db and it is an isobarik loading speaker with subwoofer at the bottom.
- #43 [Wild_7], 06-03-29 19:04Myers
I prefer Europe gears too. -
- #44 [Myers], 06-03-29 19:05The isobarik structure is probably like this. This picture borrowed from Neat Acoustics Ultimatim MF5. I think my subwoofer has 2 units with the second one located at position 'C' shown in this picture
- #45 [andyshum], 06-03-29 19:46Myers, what is your jumper between the head and bass ?
- #46 [Myers], 06-03-29 19:56The company has provided a lead but I changed it to ART's M3000 speaker cable with Furukawa's rhodium bananna plugs.
- #47 [andyshum], 06-03-29 20:01May I suggest using the same cable from amplifier and bass to mid, sound more coherence.
- #48 [belenlip], 06-03-29 20:59<<>>
唔該晒阿鐵兄, 唔知香港有無地方做呢..美國就難MD.. - #49 [belenlip], 06-03-29 21:05有綱友告之..Burmester 之原廠power cable 極有水準, 唔知相比些萬圓級別的專線又如何?
各位亦有無Burmester器材之間的線材心得可以分享? - #50 [belenlip], 06-03-29 21:18Myers 兄,
現在越來越多人轉用德國器材, 但由於德國野的音色傾向比較偏性, 故在匹配其他國家的器材時有些困難, 很多索性全套省麻煩...但德國野雖好..不過貴..比美國同級貴上三倍..真令人欲要還休.
希望兄臺早日覓得心頭好, 還請多些發表些意見, 不論是讚或彈..我總相信德國或歐洲器材不是萬靈仙單.. - #51 [andyshum], 06-03-29 21:29德國野雖好..不過貴..比美國同級貴上三倍..真令人欲要還休.>>>只是個別牌子吧 !
唔知相比些萬圓級別的專線又如何?
>>>不明為何要花上萬元去找電源專線? - #52 [tonyhkg], 06-03-29 23:17but I saw some Burmester original
power cord for sale in 1.0M is
just HKD2,800 only !
is that we call 'the original cable' ???
===========================================
Burmester Powercord
Shielded power cord 3 x 1,5 mm
Shielded power cord 3 x 2,5 mm
Triple shield consisting of aluminum coated foil, braid of tin-coated copperwire (opt. coverage greater than 90 %) and magnetic shielding foil for maximum protection against electrical and magnetic interference
Insulation resistance greater than 200 ohms x km
Max. sound damping 105.8 dB - #53 [belenlip], 06-03-30 21:36想問下各位用家, burmester 需要長開嗎? 見011有stand by 選擇, 但001又無..
不過我都無off過機, 不過想向各位求証一下. - #54 [*Mikos*], 06-03-30 21:39咁都要問????
真系開始懷疑HiFi是否有伴你四十年!!!
哈哈哈 - #55 [*Mikos*], 06-03-30 21:41如果部車有門既﹐就當然希望你系門出去架啦﹐
唔通要你系窗口到爬出去????? - #56 [andyshum], 06-03-30 21:53其實前后級最好長開, 但一定要有訊號輸入讓后級輸出給喇叭, 否則后級電容會煎, 我喜歡用收音機訊號.
- #57 [belenlip], 06-03-30 21:55Mikos..見翻你真係好..
先前X-01有人長開, 也有人off機, 不過無stand by 制, ARC Ref 2 MKII..都係有人長開也有人off機..唉..我以前玩果D前級係長開型, 唔洗off..
你知啦, 我late埋係深山十幾年, HiFi世界都翻了幾次..真係好confuse..
- #58 [*Mikos*], 06-03-30 22:28belenlip﹕
原來轉玩了Burmester﹐好。
記得去年香港音響展之後﹐
我係R33講過"德國佬玩晒"﹐
因為咁多間試音室以Bermester
以及MBL最好﹐可謂一剛一柔﹐
Burmester聲比較Sharp﹐第一次聽一定會上當﹐
但MBL就要慢慢欣賞才得﹐因為比較柔﹐但很舒服。 - #59 [*Mikos*], 06-03-30 22:32但Burmester我怕屬於"眨眼嬌"型﹐唔耐聽!!!
- #60 [*Mikos*], 06-03-30 22:34如果尋求刺激的話﹐就一定number one。
- 下一頁 (3 of 22)
- 返回 ...
what spk are you using, dyna ?