- #43 [we212], 23-03-05 13:23anyone got sa11 schematic? thx
- #42 [Ben9318], 22-11-30 11:18請問有冇師兄用SA9唱放.有事請求
- #41 [wongmondie], 22-09-18 15:02Counterpoint SA20,220好聲好力,但好易壞!
-
- #40 [sam2020], 22-09-18 12:00
- #39 [kx14cp1], 22-09-03 22:18你唔識電子,就唔好調啦,失手重大鑊。你應該先搵返賣俾你果個,睇下佢認唔認數先。
- #38 [kd1689], 22-09-03 22:03我有常試將膽調一調,結果一樣。從綱上資料,它的phono 和line 是有偏壓調,所以懷疑偏壓不對。不知C兄有冇SA5000manual ?
- #37 [kx14cp1], 22-09-02 23:28如果只係phono in有事,line in無事,試下抽插一下phono d膽先, 或phono膽左右調一調。佢裡面行好多組穩壓,正常工作的話綠色的LED應該都會著。其實部機正常的話,應該無咩野要調。
- #36 [kd1689], 22-09-02 16:25最近從二手買了部SA5000E,當玩黑膠時發覺的聲好陉,才知耍調偏壓,但又冇manual,再加本人不懂電子 .不知如可才好,所以求教大家。先謝大家
- #35 [kd1689], 22-08-22 23:03多謝C兄
- #34 [kx14cp1], 22-08-21 20:32配膽石後級都ok,本身部機訊噪比高,反應快
- #33 [kd1689], 22-08-21 11:49想請教大家,SA5000 是否reliable and stable. 如配其他膽或石從會很麻煩嗎?
Tks - #32 [BenYC], 22-03-25 20:28#31
我攪錯了。sa3 和 sa3.1 分別甚大。您的是 sa3。
最後修改時間: 2022-03-25 20:30:25 - #31 [MOSbill], 22-03-25 19:26朋友比我. 話係3.1
I have no idea, no fact check yet
最後修改時間: 2022-03-25 19:27:29 - #30 [BenYC], 22-03-25 18:05#29
Is it sa3 or sa7?
If its sa3, that I am quite wrong. I do have sa3.1 and I always thought 3 and 3.1 are similar. :) - #29 [MOSbill], 22-03-25 17:47.
- #28 [MOSbill], 22-03-25 17:45.
- #27 [BenYC], 22-03-25 16:42SA3 and SA3.1 are probably the same thing. Except that SA3.1 has a timer slow start.
Both sound very nice. - #26 [hahayanyan], 22-03-25 15:17Haha.. 永遠都有更高嘅型號更好嘅東西
並不代表我們現在已擁有的不夠好
Haha enjoy.. Haha having one is indeed better than having none...
Haha
最後修改時間: 2022-03-25 15:18:08 - #25 [MOSbill], 22-03-25 15:16Mine is SA 3.
Not as good as SA 3.1
But....cheap n good enough. Not bad - #24 [BenYC], 22-03-25 13:37Sa3.1 is a great pre. Not as dynamic as 5.1 but much more quiet. The treble is a bit suppressed. Can work very well with gotham g4 or silver cables. I like it much.
- 下一頁 (1 of 3)
- 返回 ...