- #77 [aheung], 17-01-21 11:15Wilson audio好難推得bass夠tight!
- #76 [aheung], 16-10-16 09:44遇到難推喇叭,請問各ching會用咩大電流後級應付呢?
- #75 [十連霸], 13-03-14 19:48以下節錄自 " 器材評論/楊德宜 "
「楊老前前前輩:請不要動不動就說我們的喇叭是超級宇宙世界難推好嗎?要知難行易嘛…」看到來自代理商的抱怨來函,我當然是一陣狂笑。
「這是在說Dynaudio嗎?」陸怡昶過來瞄了一眼,隨即噗哧笑了出來,「你知道全世界最難推的喇叭是哪一對嗎?Dynaudio Contour 2.8。第二難推的是哪一對?Dynaudio Contour 2.8。第三名是哪一對呢?還是Dynaudio Contour 2.8!想找一部後級來配Contour 2.8嗎?對不起,這種東西基本上不存在於地球上。」 -
- #74 [et2], 13-03-14 11:43Wife !!!
They never sound what you want.
Just kidding, - #73 [gaswong], 13-03-14 10:34apogee scintilla 1 ohm
最後修改時間: 2013-03-14 10:34:24 - #72 [laipat], 13-03-14 09:59ATC 要出聲易,要好聲有難度。
- #71 [NAR], 13-03-14 09:06cpu,
Based on your previous listening experience mainly using your wireless headphones and your imaginary 'no name' fridge size 7.x surround sound. Once again, it sounded as if you turned expert from your long silence to make suggestion what designer should be doing??? To be honest your post will not be read by any of those people involved.
Why aren't you write to them, post your suggestion here and their respond which allows us to view. It would be interesting.
your post #61: >>>>a scam to relieve your money out from your wallet>>>.
I don't think it is appropriate for you to make such groundless no proof accusation, this is typical of you isn't it?? (For being an expensive speakers HATER). Why aren't you stating accurate facts instead to support your statements.
最後修改時間: 2013-03-14 09:16:31 - #70 [cpu8088], 13-03-14 08:39yea lots of scary cats chicken out
最後修改時間: 2013-03-14 08:39:59 - #69 [m720w2], 13-03-14 02:56哈哈, 一講Wilson,耳機專家又出現啦。 自動消失, 免嘥氣。
--------------------------------------------------
x100000 - #68 [garytk], 13-03-13 23:00哈哈, 一講Wilson,耳機專家又出現啦。 自動消失, 免嘥氣。
- #67 [cpu8088], 13-03-13 20:32"""唔通噤多用家都係木耳?"""
isnt this is obvious? - #66 [JJ3380], 13-03-13 19:31你話wilson唔好声定係唔啱閣下口味呀?唔通噤多用家都係木耳?
- #65 [garytk], 13-03-13 18:341000%不同意,一些老友玩Wislon玩到好聲到震, 不受音樂種類限制, 瓣瓣掂!
- #64 [pin], 13-03-13 02:47>>>>>亞力山寨好多機都可以推到吨牉, 但係冇一個玩得呇n聽..
唔止亞力山寨﹐任何一款的wilson audio都從來未聽過好聲
1000% agree - #63 [cyruschow], 13-03-12 16:29is it real ????
- #62 [cpu8088], 08-11-07 02:40"""If the sensitivity of most sp is up to 90dB then everyone is only require a 10 to 20W amp. Who need those Hi power 200-2000W and expensive amp."""
you may need the headroom during a burst of music. 10 to 20 W may just be the rms root mean square output rating - #61 [cpu8088], 08-11-07 02:38"""Don't understand what is the point of designing a speaker that 90%+ amplifier in the market couldn't handle!"""
a scam to relieve your money out from your wallet. - #60 [DYreal], 08-11-07 00:58If I am the power amp manufacturer then I must try to own more speaker factory to product the very low efficiency speaker.
If the sensitivity of most sp is up to 90dB then everyone is only require a 10 to 20W amp. Who need those Hi power 200-2000W and expensive amp. - #59 [myers], 08-11-06 22:22Don't understand what is the point of designing a speaker that 90%+ amplifier in the market couldn't handle!
- #58 [cpu8088], 08-11-06 17:19a speaker than still uses crossovers, inductors, resistors to split the power of a single amp, by definition, is not not SOTA. It may still manage to sound good, despite itself, but that's also likely because our expectations are still pretty low.
I think also is that we don't have enough digital systems to provide a sufficient variety and many are simply too ugly or expensive for most people to consider. many speaker engineers and sales guys at CEDIA considered the one thing was clear that a) they felt digital technology was a huge leap forward and b) it doesn't matter if people aren't ready for it. - 下一頁 (3 of 6)
- 返回 ...