- #41 [kkkkiu], 13-11-21 20:40當然偶爾地才達文西都會有好野既~XDXD
- #42 [spyder], 13-11-21 21:30#39
非常同意 - #43 [jbl9800], 13-11-22 07:54剛睇完原文章,覺得作者有点偏於人類科學來看事,當然過中有指出商人怎樣遊說消費者去掏利,但最重要是,我認為作者並非一個資深hi fi用家,因為他指出列子很多都違反hi fi友使用經驗,我自己是電子工程人員,認為很多美国声譽好的生產商他們提出的理論都有依據以及对声音有關係,例如負回輸與否,確實有明顯声音取向分別,只是各有支持者
-
- #44 [V.C], 13-11-22 09:37唔洗用到痛批咁激嘅.事實市場大把高消費者衹愛聽謊言.
- #45 [cpu8088], 13-11-22 09:47"""我認為作者並非一個資深hi fi用家,因為他指出列子很多都違反hi fi友使用經驗,"""
a lot of experienced audiophiles are suckers. why would the author be one of them? lol - #46 [tpc], 13-11-22 09:52世上沒有最靚聲既線材及器材,只有最matching既線材及器材.
- #47 [ultramanzero], 13-11-22 10:54玩HiFi你話無心理作用就真係自欺欺人!
最近睇咗一集 NGEO 既 Brain Games,就係講人腦既對號入座及先入為主,當知道要去比較兩樣"應該有分別"的東西時(當時用視覺),人腦就會為比較而比較,自然地找到一D分別出黎,但其實呢兩樣東西係完全 Identical!
最後修改時間: 2013-11-22 11:02:31 - #48 [NAR], 13-11-22 11:22cpu
>>>"""a lot of experienced audiophiles are suckers. why would the author be one of them? lol"""
What makes you think you are superior?
You had nothing to show us in the past and still had nothing to show us now except bad mouthing others with all your nonsense.
You made a statement that you owned those fridge size no name speakers for your surround sound 7.2 in the other threads here in R33. We had been waiting for a long time to see what so special about them. What have you got to hide?
最後修改時間: 2013-11-22 11:35:53 - #49 [peter827], 13-11-22 11:51我相信就算返到火星都係片地謊言。
- #50 [cpu8088], 13-11-22 14:46nar
did u read the thread that wilson has sasha II coming out?
whats wrong with sasha I? if sasha II is better that means corrections of the faults in previous design? if sasha II is inferior that means wilson is going backward.
what do u say?
what i own and use is none of your business. period.
最後修改時間: 2013-11-22 14:47:30 - #51 [music_exotics], 13-11-22 16:23通遍以點打面,以偏概全,甚至於是偽知識,刊登於財經新聞一類,可算是誤人子弟。
估計原文是翻譯自美國的 X2
音響好多野都唔可以用理論解釋到,無耳仔既先會用理論!!!
得啖笑!! - #52 [mark1], 13-11-22 16:44#46 世上沒有最靚聲既線材及器材,只有最matching既線材及器材.
................................................
何謂最matching既線材及器材 ?
最matching你隻金耳朵 ??
定係最matching乜野 ??? - #53 [mark1], 13-11-22 16:47音響好多野都唔可以用理論解釋到,無耳仔既先會用理論!!!
..............................................
真的嗎 ? - #54 [ultramanzero], 13-11-22 17:31音響好多野都唔可以用理論解釋到,無耳仔既先會用理論!!!
即係話音響係玄學並非電聲科學,咁下次聽嘢前裝番支香可能會好聲D! - #55 [mark1], 13-11-22 17:40咁用電腦設計分音器都幾多餘
- #56 [kenlam2007], 13-11-22 18:00見過有人用 塔羅牌 ,水晶石,玉器 較聲 !
- #57 [NAR], 13-11-22 20:21Product like the old 8088 without update and improvements. If you are still using one of those today, you will not be blogging in R33.
CPU8088, admit it, u hate new products from Wilson. this is your own business, but don't make it person in a forum. Just don't tell us Wilson Audio should not make further improvements in products based on more modern available materials and designs.
You are one of the offenders related in this thread topic. If you like to challenge Wilson product. Start up a new thread, i am sure none of the members here like the kind of noise you made here.
最後修改時間: 2013-11-22 20:26:47 - #58 [s6410], 13-11-22 20:47what do u say?
what i own and use is none of your business. period.
-----------------------------------
Still wandering around like a zombie over the Internet after all these years ha ha!!!
Sorry won't spend time arguing with this on dog dog. He is just a pathetic say lonely broke unnamed online!
P.S.: Your reaction already indicated most of what you owned are shit! - #59 [cpu8088], 13-11-22 21:00s6410
why dont you show what gear u are using?
you wont spend time because u are like nar cannot answer questions on sasha II.
on the contrary my reaction indicated i got state of the art equipment which you have not heard before. - #60 [cpu8088], 13-11-22 21:03"""this is your own business, but don't make it person in a forum"""
i dont see how to make a person in a forum.
if u cannot express yourself properly in english u better use chinese. - 下一頁 (3 of 4)
- 返回 ...