- #1 [天籟], 09-03-14 10:57
- #2 [天籟], 09-03-14 11:08應該係隻牛粒燈時光時暗.
- #3 [ecc803s], 09-03-14 12:15B759+Ecc801s
-
- #4 [accphoto], 09-03-14 12:44四萬元換隻電源牛,香港的 HiFi 鋪真係好搵....
- #5 [dh555], 09-03-14 12:48一定是真 Ecc803 好.
部全新膽整流 現在有錢都買唔到.
除非, 市場有 100部 order, Matisse Boss 才開條新 Production Line....
一定不會在大陸設生產線.
Regards - #6 [dh555], 09-03-14 13:02Matisse 老鬼 校聲和設計 No 1. 欣賞角度和自己能力當然是歸於自己.
好多Eur Ing 都未必是懂校聲和設計.
有沒有錢付 和 欣賞 未必可在同一個人找到.
或者二樣都沒有.
就算隻PP 5980 鋼錶 炒到HK$600,000 都有大班人等貨.
雖然我沒錢買隻 PP, 只怪自己未夠努力, 但我知價識貨. - #7 [1derful], 09-03-14 14:36I agree with ecc803s
B759 + ECC801s is the best bet.
If you use A2900, it will burn very fast. ECC801s can last MUCH longer.
>之前返MATISSE ASIA 陳生說我用舊機可換個全新膽整流or輸出的電源牛, 一換一要4萬幾, 仲貴過我部機, 因當時太太在樓下等無時間座低比較, 我無換到, 請問有無人換過, 是否真的差很遠? 值得花這
Tube regulation is not the same thing as tube rectification. Don't be fool by idiot salesman.
The original Matisse Reference has 4 discrete ss HV regulators, one for each tube. The tube version has one tube regulator for all 4 tubes. - #8 [dh555], 09-03-14 16:25The most important things 校聲和設計.
Indeed, invitation to buy is not force any fans to buy.
We could all go to Sham Shui Po to buy all these component but we could not reproduce these sound.
Why not fans try to find an opportunity to audition this model or pursuit an equivalent..
It it the IP and Design philosophy that worth $$ but not material - #9 [ecc803s], 09-03-14 16:35IMHO the second choice is Mullard long black plate 12AX7(the oldest version)+ECC801s.
- #10 [stephen], 09-03-14 23:54
- #11 [329], 09-03-15 10:48Wow!!!
Very beautiful! - #12 [stephen], 09-03-15 14:33黑色經典
- #13 [stephen], 09-03-15 14:41大眾化matisse,聽說有mk1 & mk2
- #14 [stephen], 09-03-15 15:01記憶中,初引入matisse好像不是MATISSE ASIA..
有空我問問朋友:p - #15 [stephen], 09-03-15 15:11十年前,$4000支德仔朋友也說不好聲,真係各有所好,最緊要自己喜歡...
- #16 [simcity], 09-03-16 16:21
This one off Matisse Reference belongs to my friend, who is also the inventor of the "Conductor". And this specially made item is using the best sorted components and have a golden plate embedded inside the chassis with his name marked on it! - #17 [天籟], 09-03-16 16:35雖然我用膽機已十幾廿年, 但對膽同電子的常識可以話一無所知, 原來用A2900支膽會好快玩完? 等我得閒換返支德仔比較下先. 我想問換膽應該邊兩支是LINE AMP, 邊兩支是PHONO, 有時D人的講法有所不同. 買膽時條友話換2支A2900是比LINE AMP的, 但MATISSE陳生話應該81及83各換1支才對.
12AX7是否換部機的83位罝, 而ECC801S換落81的位置? B759又是否=ECC83? 謝! - #18 [1derful], 09-03-16 16:38This one is ok partially using top grade PRC.
However, the one in 2nd hand market is even more preferable with top grade PRC in every position except plate resistors.
Notice the Wima coupling caps are bigger in 'Golden Version' - #19 [1derful], 09-03-16 16:43>原來用A2900支膽會好快玩完? 等我得閒換返支德仔比較下先.
That's my experience with triple mica A2900. TFK801s sounds a bit thin and analytic so you should use some thick sounding X7 like Mullard long plate to balance the sound.
>買膽時條友話換2支A2900是比LINE AMP的, 但MATISSE陳生話應該81及83各換1支才對.
陳生is correct. 條友 is just BS.
>12AX7是否換部機的83位罝, 而ECC801S換落81的位置? B759又是否=ECC83?
Yes. Yes. Yes. - #20 [k.c.78], 09-03-16 17:37四支膽(x7+t7)比line amp.phono(mc)用升壓牛.ecc801s=ecc81/12at7.... b759=ecc83/12ax7....
- 下一頁 (1 of 13)
- 返回 ...
其實我用過的前級包括:Krell KBL, Mark 38S, Marantz 7(New), AR SP-11MK2, M.F.及其他日本機等, 但一直沿用至今不捨得買的只有Ref. 起初我用telefunken膽已收貨, 但後來換了2支GEC A2900 軍用膽又更靚聲了, 分析力及控制力都高了, 而人聲依然甜美. 但最衰三年前去MATISSE ASIA 維修時比佢換左我一支, 取機時無拆開睇, 過後睇到, 對方已無法跟進. 現在要買返一支A2900的價錢已貴過我當年買兩支了. 不知有無網友提供其他更好的選擇?
之前返MATISSE ASIA 陳生說我用舊機可換個全新膽整流or輸出的電源牛, 一換一要4萬幾, 仲貴過我部機, 因當時太太在樓下等無時間座低比較, 我無換到, 請問有無人換過, 是否真的差很遠? 值得花這4萬幾嗎?