- #75 [BenYC], 21-05-09 09:31
- #74 [gchan2001], 21-05-09 08:19Ben Ching,
A well maintained KEF107 is not bad, but the bass signature is not to everybody liking, furthermore the aging problem of the internal twin bass driver is an annoying problem. i gave up already.
I now go with bookshelf with a subwoofer controlled by DSP, a good experience. - #73 [BenYC], 21-05-08 16:23One of the speakers I always want to have a listen is kef 107. The look is so cute too.
-
- #72 [hahayanyan], 21-05-08 15:35haha i do not consider aging speaker surround replacement is an issue ..hah it is subjective..as some driver may last 50 yrs without the need of such replacement
for all those speaker mentioned.......... i like the 3A the most..haha ( because of the lookkkkkkkkkkk it really look niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee )
最後修改時間: 2021-05-08 15:39:25 - #71 [hahayanyan], 21-05-08 15:17cannot disagree about 沒有 KEF 味的 KEF
however ...haha i have so many friends.......all used and using this generation of KEF ref.. never have driver issue..haha
but no one used 103... mostly the bookshelf or 105
yes all..those KEF i know..of..need surrounding replacement ..every one of them.... and the internal centre donuts etc.. too ... every pair..
my friend did that replacment a few months ago..... happy..
i would say... some of the very good speaker for less than 10K.. haha
i do not care "kef " taste or not.. if it is enjoyable then it is haha
最後修改時間: 2021-05-08 15:32:15 - #70 [phil.ng], 21-05-08 15:12單元易死丶R33 已有兩個標題
最沒有 KEF 味的 KEF
當年好快巳轉款
高音有點過量丶多 SSSS
在外國丶平到你吾信丶箱內單元多死邊丶你肉眼見不到
Hi. I just bought a pair of KEF 103/4 on ebay for $123.00 (plus $90.00 shipping). The foams need to be replaced on the 4 internally mounted 6-1/2" woofers, but otherwise they seem in nice shape. Anyone out there have any experience with these speakers?
最後修改時間: 2021-05-08 15:21:05 - #69 [hahayanyan], 21-05-08 14:23Another example of decent floorstander.. Good
I suppose ok for hkd5500.. 6000ish - #68 [BenYC], 21-05-07 23:59#66
在我角度看,用錯機了。gryphon 從來冇力感。不過有人鍾意果種「嘆世界」聲。
其實玩幾多錢,同玩幾好,是沒必然關係的。
當然我的意見是主觀的。因音嚮是主觀的。
最後修改時間: 2021-05-08 00:07:24 - #67 [Firstwatt], 21-05-07 23:5770呎玩座地建議試下Audio Physic, 小提琴出得好靚,爆棚亦有氣勢
- #66 [phil.ng], 21-05-07 23:45要玩盡A丅C丶除了力,又要靚聲丶多數妹仔大過主人婆
所以推薦ATC 易玩身家丶並非reasonable power 就得
有朋友試過ATC 100, 用幾十萬貴豐推不到滿意丶放棄了 ATC
提出Krell 400cx 是答"Class A..........can sound boring and confined. "
最後修改時間: 2021-05-07 23:59:12 - #65 [niceday009], 21-05-07 22:3770呎擺坐地喇叭,最好搵窄身長條型,如果唔係出唔到stereo sound field
- #64 [BenYC], 21-05-07 22:35And you think someone would use a krell 400 to drive a scm7 permanently? Who is being unrealistic here? Or have you ever seen me recommending things without considering the whole picture, including budget?
最後修改時間: 2021-05-07 22:36:01 - #63 [BenYC], 21-05-07 21:57#62
I do budget match. Nothing fancy. Used in office. Just an honest working combo. - #62 [phil.ng], 21-05-07 21:51有個朋友用手波開蓬保時捷丶發現吾夠坐丶買多部 Volvo XC90, 大叫好底丶好 reasonable, 可坐多多人!
是不是這樣的 reasonable?
Class A boring with ATC! Try Krell 400cx or better
最後修改時間: 2021-05-07 21:58:27 - #61 [BenYC], 21-05-07 21:48I think it really depends on matching. I actually like atc in general as they are quite neutral.
I droved scm7 with a musical fidelity 90w and parasound 200w class AB before. Many think atc is bad because they either use tube or class A. Generally, tube is bad because atc needs current. Class A is also not suitable as they are usually warm, smooth and can sound boring and confined.
Of coz, the above are general view, there are always exceptions.
(I never heard but I imagine bryston and atc will sound awesome.)
最後修改時間: 2021-05-07 21:50:58 - #60 [Andy3210], 21-05-07 20:58Your easy drive definition is using 150W AB class dedicated power amp?
Eventhough in Dealer demo, the soundstage is just like the sound comes from a room.
最後修改時間: 2021-05-07 21:01:33 - #59 [BenYC], 21-05-07 18:07Actually I had a scm7 before. It is easy to drive as long as amp is reasonable.
- #58 [Andy3210], 21-05-07 17:50#57
I think this norm excluding SCM7, definitely wrong shoot. - #57 [BenYC], 21-05-07 16:54#55
I used to think the same. Yet, after all these years, I found that it really depends on the brand's targeted market and what the user has in hand to match the speakers.
Take Sonus Faber as an example, if I am using a budget amp, their previous Venere line will get good results: full sounding, dynamic and musical. Yet, if one use the same budget amp to drive their audiophile line... it is just bad. (This case applies to a lot of brands that have multiple lines of products.)
In a way, speaker factory is trying to guess match their customers just like we try to budget match our own stuff.
最後修改時間: 2021-05-07 16:56:04 - #56 [hahayanyan], 21-05-07 16:01入門啱曬
- 下一頁 (2 of 5)
- 返回 ...
The isobaric is indeed troublesome but I am so impressed with 107 spec. 20-20k for the size is simply amazing。I would imagine back in those days driven by a day bryston 7b will be mind blowing.