其實我一直有第三隻唱盤， Sony 直驅全自動，1980-90 年代出品，在 Charity shop 十分便宜購得。聽完不合心意, 登了一星期今日售出，現在真係有個空位迎接 ＭＣ 頭的唱盤連臂。



最後修改時間: 2024-07-17 22:19:39

每天早上都為不同的事情 開會講電話

剛剛講完一個電話可以吹water 兩句

有位放三個唱盤真係幸福

即係加一個1229 or 1229Q, and at least keep 1 dual blet drive..

即係仲有一個 更換嘅位置啦 haha

話唔定你玩過idler... 想要兩個idler, and one belt drive...

Or 1 1229, 1 dual belt drive and 1 other belt drive...

有限制令玩得更高樂趣, 最重要係有三個空間位置

睇下轉頭朋友會唔會話畀我聽去玩嗰啲乜嘢mc頭 at 1229

Haha

Thanks! Ｈａｈａ　兄。

佢哋好有耐性，我都有耐性。 :)

Yoyoyo rcwy hing

今早有點忙, 簡單來說冇問題等我搵多啲資料畀你, 等我有問一問我嗰個朋友用緊咩嘢頭

肯定當年用過一啲around 8 gram 嘅唱頭嘅

Shall be busy for a few more hours.. Chat later haha

Haha



Haha

哈哈 兄，

小弟已有兩隻盤，都是 DUAL (505-2 及 510）都是 ＭＭ頭。

入手第三隻盤應是此生最後的一隻 (因音響架的枱面有限，自己年齡也不輕) 所以會用上已買了多年仍未用過已帶來英國的 DENON DL103R 頭及 DENON AU300LC 升壓牛，我知道MC 頭重量 (mass) 較 MM 頭重量高好多，所以對於唱臂會有不同的要求。

1229 的唱臂看似重些，兄台有冇試用 ＭＣ 頭在 1229 支唱臂上?

最後修改時間: 2024-07-17 13:08:25

Fully automatic old table

其中有一部luxman, pd272 我仲keep住 DD, the automatic mechanism is so good and super smart and simple design too

That DD motor is excellent, I keeping it becase of the motor

May be sometime in the future I make use of it

Haha

Yes I had one, and my friend having it now, VS lenco, hard to tell which is better, however at that moment I have more 搞搞震 moment with a lenco

That is very good, once u have it, u may want build a better base.. Etc.. For it, it is very good

I would say, it is better than my dual direct drive, better than a lot of belt drive, I keep that dual direct drive, because impressed by the way they made that motor (I was a motor maker)

I always and still believe, must c lover should have a belt, a DD and a idler

There are 3 idler table I wish to get, 隨緣.. One is Braun and one is thorens , an old Kenwood

I love the lenco, as it is just a super smart design device

I value design appreciation and the way an item look, far more than A/B sound quality

For certain cartridge, I cannot see any hi end tone arm is really technically better than it ( some may really. Use better material for some technical aspect at right place..
But those may cost 1k plus , Epsecially that dual arm can cost as little as £15

It is a good table, not hard to find a decent one less than £100

Idler table is indeed better for some faster tempo rock music


Fully automatic table is just a joy. To use, I can still tolerate with manual.. That was why.. I always use fully automatic dual for back ground music, manual for just a song



Oh.. I keeping an vintage idler Elac fully. Auto too, oh.. I have forgot, a good table... But the arm is average, but so pleasant to look



Haha






最後修改時間: 2024-07-16 19:17:23

Haha hing,

Any experience with a DUAL 1229 ? I started to be interested in it, a fully automatic TT, Idler drive (not direct drive that I don't like).

Yoyoyo good. Morning


It is a dual 621, also plastic with wood veener

It is quite a typical German engineering with quite a bit of effective optimization

最後修改時間: 2024-07-02 15:20:19

Good morning, Haha hing.

Talking about DUAL 505-2 and 510 belt-driven turntables. The original plinth of 505-2 is made of thin plastic, a very filmsy base from cheap mass production. Hold down our usual prejudice first... its bass never ulters resonance or vibrationary noise, even when I finger-knobed the bass! This filmsy plastic bass is from a miracle design!

510 belt-driven has a slightly more solid plinth, with a veener look, but is still filmsy plastic.

I love both DUALs.

What model is yours? Direct-driven has higher demand on the motor and electronic servo system to maintain spinning speed to be accurate. Therefore not as simple and easy to maintain as the belt-driven DUALs.

Cheers!

最後修改時間: 2024-07-02 14:22:17

if u come across a Dual direct drive at 30.... why not....and try try

they all having that light weight and very nice tonearm too

thx you thx you

最後修改時間: 2024-07-02 07:46:38

Haha hing,

Any time welcome...! Just tell me beforehand.

Both 505-2 and 510 are belt-drive, simple and easy to maintain.

Thx Thx rcwy hing

I enjoy my dual direct drive automatic table very much, very capable for more than casual listening haha

One day.. 如果去你個區探親戚.. 會試下預早通知你.. Haha


Haha

Haha Hing,

Both TT are from DUAL : 505-2 and 510. They have the same tonearm as seen, came with good working MM cartbridges (Audio Technica and Shure respectively) - only 60 each!

DAC from Hong Kong. Nice sounding!

最後修改時間: 2024-07-02 06:30:08

is a nice photo

i love dual table too

one of them is Dual, and what is the other one?

what DAC are u using for this vintage system ?

thxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



最後修改時間: 2024-07-02 06:18:38

朋友有興趣知，剛用圖片介紹了如何用標準ＲＣＡ在位接駁眾多膽機（英式美式不同電壓)



最後修改時間: 2024-07-01 19:23:39

Very happy with the results.

終於入手一對更加匹配 TL12.1 的 mono 前級 - 無需再用 "苳菇頭" 藏一對電阻
降低 TL12.1 的超高靈敏度 (0.125V input for full output power)。



最後修改時間: 2024-07-01 08:07:02

(a chat with a friend)

在家再聽point one, 愈來愈好。但是，由於左邊audio signal 是用電源線內的其中一條wire, 而右邊則用RCA 輸出audio signal, 好明顯右邊的RCA 的線材比較好，於是左右聲道不對稱，是否沒有辦法解決？還是更改point one 的 audio out，加多左聲道的RCA out?

那年代剛從 monologue進入 stereo 兩聲道的立體聲，英國設計師由沿用的「臍帶」embryonic cord 起步，但是沒有發燒到用兩條臍帶去一個 Point One Stereo。

古董嘅嘢唔好動不動就想改佢滿足發燒嘅動機，對於古董級嘅經典要尊重原設計，唔好「無啦啦搞達啦」。

嗰條臍帶要照顧6.3V AC電源，又要照顧近 300V DC電源，仲要照顧訊號微弱嘅全頻AC電流，出嚟嘅效果竟然係咁好，好好！冇爆炸，冇堪 hum，冇互相干擾，仲要在設定之下要低過 0.1 % 失真，天呀！推翻什麼「線材」理論，所以什麼 Silｘｘx 、Norｘｘｘ 、等等⋯⋯ 超級名貴線材都...(幾乎係騙局)。




最後修改時間: 2024-06-26 18:47:03

ＬＥＡＫ　ＰＯＩＮＴ　ＯＮＥ　ＳＴＥＲＥＯ