- #61 [hakman], 05-08-27 13:42
- #62 [cmyipp2], 05-08-27 14:16hakman is very accurate in articulating the hifi landscape in HK.
when i can squeeze one hour or two for hi fi, i subconsciously urge the system to give me enjoyment of hifi sound and effect and performance at once. this is really wrong. but the source of evil is the pace of life and requirements from all directions.
playing hifi in HK for commmon people is just as difficult as driving in HK, unbelievably rush and rush, every inch counts. - #63 [angelfish51], 05-08-28 02:57788大概3萬蚊倒啦,我而家用伶聽空間百多尺對688都仲未玩盡,愈來愈好聲,好似hakman同fungfung兄所講,我覺得250尺左右會有比較好發揮^^
-
- #64 [angelfish51], 05-08-28 02:58我覺得788用係250尺左右地方會有比較好發揮^^
- #65 [angelfish51], 05-08-28 03:07JRJR兄,
我覺得688都唔難夾機,688比較上有音樂感,唔想d聲太的話可以楝d高分析力既原子粒機,我覺得krell400xi同MF A5都ok,krell速度快,MF就musical d,最好自己去試試,enjoy! - #66 [bobbychu], 05-08-28 03:39Hi every big brother:
請問每邊100W 的 AMP 可唔可以玩得好788呢? - #67 [razor], 05-08-28 10:481. angelfish51 FS-688
2. mcm FS-888
3. BandH FS-78s
4. jimmison FS-68se
5. hiendboy FS-788
6. prodip FS-788
7. simcity FS-78s
8. ALEXANDER FS-78
9. fungfung334 MT1
10. hotdogbl MT1
11. SmallB FS-78se
12. DAC FS-68s
13. danielccn FS-78se
14. alman FS-688
15. Ray939 MT1
16. jrjr FS-688
17. felix FS-68
18. euro FS78s
19. lofai13 FS68SE
20. hakman MT1
21. CowB FR7
22. eRie FS-68
23. Razor MT-1 - #68 [hiendboy], 05-08-28 12:09I have recommendation for all Focus Audio speaker user,pls try to use true bi-wire to connect it with amp and you may find the improvement is so great.
- #69 [hakman], 05-08-28 16:19Totaly agree with hiendboy.
I had tested with several Cardas spk cables:
Neutral reference (single wire)
Golden reference (bi-wire)
Cross link Golden (single wire)
Hexlink link Golden 5C (bi-wire)
Finally I choose the Hexlink link Golden 5C (bi-wire). - #70 [angelfish51], 05-08-30 10:43could bros here share the speaker cable using for your FA speaker, i'm now thinking of buying a new pair of speaker cable for my jeff amp -> FS688, any suggestion? thanks^^
- #71 [JRJR], 05-08-30 11:46angelfish51兄..我用緊harmonix 101slc, smooth, 高頻唔錯,但覺得係比較柔個面, 但我諗如果用jeff + slc +688 小提琴之類非常正...
- #72 [angelfish51], 05-08-30 12:26JRJR兄,多謝提供,harmonix hs101比我既印象係比較thick & musical,請問hs101-slc好什麼分別,同大概幾多錢到?請問知唔知kimber mono-x又點睇?thx
- #73 [hiendboy], 05-08-30 12:32I use Audio note Lexus for high and Harmonix 101 for mid-low.Harmonix 101 is very good for sound stage.
- #74 [bobbychu], 05-08-30 18:53Hi every big brothers
我之前聽過788,很喜歡它的聲音及外形。但我的石後級每邊得100W,唔知有無能力玩得好788,另快聲機推788聲效如何,請多多指教。thanks. - #75 [razor], 05-08-30 19:17Hi Bobby,
100W 石機推788可能好吃力,亦未必可以發揮到788的潛能。如果你鍾意788個樣,你不妨考慮下MT1。MT1十分之易推,我用300B(monoblock)都推得好好,而且個樣都唔輸蝕。不過音色始終差788一皮,(價錢都差一皮多D) - #76 [BandH], 05-08-31 00:01Hi! angelfish51兄, I use audio note an-l for high and audio note an-b for low. Quite good.
- #77 [bobbychu], 05-08-31 13:37Razor
謝謝回覆。我有朋友亦用MT1,聲效亦非常好。所以先會考慮FA,我在showroom試聽時,個sales話我套機亦有可能推得好,叫我可以試下。我老細都話妠X靚仔,可以入屋,唉!無耐,力有不逮。
bobbychu - #78 [BandH], 05-08-31 19:26力有不逮係指...........^_^
- #79 [bobbychu], 05-08-31 23:44BandH hing
唉!無耐,力有不逮。。。。。〔係指我部後級唔夠力推得好788。〕 - #80 [avfever], 05-09-01 11:29Hello! I am using MT-1 and use Ayre AX7 integrated Amp to drive (only 70W per channel). The soundstage is very good! So I think MT-1 is quite easy to drive and the overall performance is very good when comparing my previous Proac Response 1.5.
- 下一頁 (4 of 48)
- 返回 ...
香港人玩音響的困難:
一、香港土地昂貴,一般家庭式居所能騰出200呎空間已經很不錯了。
二、避震、電源、礎魽B佈局、吸音和擴散:當器材、線材愈升級,它們的靈敏度愈高,稍有以上的變化,聲音立刻不同。
三、主觀性的心理問題:香港人工作繁忙,曰理萬機,如果沒輕鬆愉悅的心情聽音樂,音響器材過百萬又如何?若果對音樂表達能力領悟不足,何以投入當中?
因為我缺乏上述條件,所以只可停留在低檔的層次來玩音響,那些盲目追尋昂貴音響器材的人而缺乏上述客觀和主觀之條件,善哉!