- #52 [facemask], 24-05-06 16:50早排爛船一出冊就改名出嚟搏吊, 都估都係佢!
- #51 [CodyChan], 24-05-05 14:35福街丁滿又開始推舊貼!
正冚家產!
收皮啦! - #50 [tingmoon], 24-05-05 13:59class D equipment has improved a lot nowadays, yet not expensive
-
- #49 [TriangleFans], 10-03-29 07:46NAD & Rotel are made in China.
- #48 [栗山千明], 10-03-29 01:35要平又要好聲試下NAD同Rotel啦!!!
- #47 [UFO33], 10-03-29 01:35,,一分錢,一分貨..
not exactly 其實 HiFi 市場是商業市場亦是
<<大千世界>>也, 一分錢,最多半分貨,已經是有誠意了
若非這樣,就不須摩机改机,眾多DIY高手也就無用武之地了, - #46 [UFO33], 10-03-29 01:32<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>
not exactly 其實 HiFi 市場是商業市場亦是
<<>>也, 一分錢,最多半分貨,已經是有誠意了
若非這樣,就不須摩机改机,眾多DIY高手也就無用武之地了, - #45 [anthlai], 10-03-28 22:51一分錢一分貨 + 配撘適宜 才有望有正常聲,最後好唔好聲要睇你的軟件了^ ^
最後修改時間: 2010-03-28 22:52:39 - #44 [mc240], 10-03-28 22:43一分錢,一分貨..
- #43 [mikelee], 10-03-28 17:15cpu8088,
can't u see that i'm just teasing? take it easy, man. :P
anyway, the question is pretty irrelevant. no matter what the so-called "good sound" is, the price of a hi-fi system can't give us any highly sensible hints. but generally speaking, the cost counts.
i suggest brothers to try to form your own idea of good sound if you still haven't. and enjoy the walk towards your ideal sound. it may be expensive. it may be time-consuming. it may be difficult. it may be all of them. but isn't it the price we have to pay for the fun of hi-fi as a hobby?
forget about the nonsense of the neccessary relationships between the price and the sound of hi-fi. just be open-minded, confident of your own judgment on the sound you hear and critical. then, enjoy the music. it's the ultimate goal, isn't it?
最後修改時間: 2010-03-28 17:31:07 - #42 [UFO33], 10-03-28 14:53>>>用錢玩音响唔係一定會好聲,只不過是比較容易好聲而矣!!!
- #41 [ncw2889], 10-03-28 14:40首先定乜叫好聲!
- #40 [idt2000], 10-03-28 13:03哎, 對不起離了題!
- #39 [idt2000], 10-03-28 13:02有很多燒交示音響為一種精神寄託, 往往很多都未必有其它興趣, 於是很自然會示它為一種慰藉, 當然我亦不會建議人們不停亦超短時間去upgrade & upgrade! 最少也要明白自己的要求, 摸清器材的特性, 理智地upgrade, 若可以做到這點,慢慢跟據自己的取向, 經濟能力去upgrade, 點點滴滴, 這不但可為自己帶來滿心偷悅,嘅不傷神,也不傷荷苞。
因曾經有些朋友只淘大量金錢不停換機, 買回來2 星期不夠又換,問他何固?他自己也不知,既然知道自己不是那些視錢財如無物的暴發户,何必這樣,將金錢時間放在軟件上, 聽多點音樂,玩少點器材,這不更好! - #38 [aw135246], 10-03-28 11:39還沒買回來的器材最好聲。 Agree X 2
- #37 [711], 10-03-28 11:01有些事,我們都知道:每次 upgrade 都要比多 d 錢。
還有的是,還沒買回來的器材最好聲。 :p - #36 [tenny], 10-03-28 10:42貴音響器材一定好聲! - 我( 第一次 ) 否定!
好聲音響器材一定好貴! - 我( 再第二次 ) 否定!
養肥曬班 ( 大鱷 ) ,什麼 (名牌 )音響廠家!!!
往豪宅,玩 ( More Young Girls ) ,揸靚車.
-------------------------------------------------
貴音響器材一定好聲 ( 和 ) 好聲音響器材一定好貴! - 回頭是岸呀?!
-------------------------------------------------
有( 某些 ) 廠家,有某些 ( 型號 ) , 真是物起所值 ( 是寶藏 ) ,
但 又有( 某些 ) 廠家,有某些 ( 型號 ) , 真是物非所值 ( 是刼財-小心!!!)
-------------------------------------------------
Hungmao 兄 : 的( 論點 ) , 我也非常同意
( 論點 1 ) 調音又係一種藝術,調得越接近就係好聲,
因此與價格未必有直接關係.
( 論點 2 )人的虛榮心態,使得咁多$,心理上都可能會覺得好 聲d,因為接受唔到自己使多咗$但d聲同以
前參唔多或衰聲過之前.
朋友們!!! 早點回航吧???
回頭是岸. 回頭是岸. 回頭是岸.
最後修改時間: 2010-03-28 10:44:40 - #35 [Pilotrol], 10-03-28 10:39好聲音響器材一定好貴!
------------------------------
好聲音響器材唔一定好貴,其中一個例子是小弟二十幾年前在加拿大有位Hi-Fi朋友新屋入伙,他剛花咗兩萬幾元加幣買咗一套Hi-End前後級,小弟有日同佢經過Garage Sales用二百蚊加幣幫佢買咗部Fisher 500-C方便佢放係房用...!結局是意想不到地一部古董Receiver竟一下子把一套萬幾兩萬加幣Hi-End前後級比下去...,當年小弟都被Fisher 500-C的表現嚇了一跳...!
直至2005年Audiophiles才寫了一篇有關Fisher 500-C的報導,經報導後多了人認識,而2005年後Fisher 500-C的價格卻上升了許多:
http://www.stereophile.com/historical/605fisher/index.html - #34 [PC168], 10-03-28 10:04好聲音響器材一定好貴!
- #33 [davidcapman], 10-03-28 09:18完全同意Pilotrol兄的觀點。
- 下一頁 (1 of 3)
- 返回 ...