- #47 [spyder], 10-12-06 16:01
- #46 [cpu8088], 10-12-06 15:09"""因為你的注意力放落旋律中,所以好似少咗D炒豆。"""
this is entirely bs. if u can do that why u need to wash your LPs. or u are saying u have a lot of crappy music LPs? - #45 [spong], 10-12-06 12:02所以話偉利曾Sir講D野係深層次既!
我個人就唔會連續play隻click click聲既LP拾次去試呢D野. -
- #44 [zoltm], 10-12-06 11:45
- #43 [BillySIU], 10-12-06 11:39徳發偉X話隻LP play多10次8次啦 D微粒就會挑哂出嚟 is not 老點.
reasons being the more u play the statics will be eliminated gradually, plus your stylus will dig out the dirt thats at the bottom of the grooves and clean up the LPs. Of course each time you played u have to brush the surface of the LPs.
i cannot see how u accuse someone is 100% 老點. Perhaps u have not tried nor having the expertise in this area.
............
唔通d黑膠碟日日聽,就越來越乾淨,就連洗碟機都慳返?
我自己無論新碟或二手碟我都會用部Loricraft 洗碟洗一次先播放。新碟洗完後,可以清潔咗製造過程中表面的離(帽)濟,聽出來會更加清晰同細緻。
玩黑膠要接受炒豆聲,無論新舊碟都會有,只是多與少分別!當音樂好聽的時候,炒豆聲自然減少,因為你的注意力放落旋律中,所以好似少咗D炒豆。
最後修改時間: 2010-12-06 11:46:27 - #42 [spong], 10-12-06 10:16趁呢兩曰得閒 手洗LP達40隻 中央既label紙最好用風筒吹乾.
洗前同洗後聽track 1/2發覺D炒豆聲真係少好多!
有D就唔得...例如周璇之歌....睇黎係壞的好不了,好的壞不了.
請問各位師兄有冇試過机動同手動洗LP直接A/B比較過;效果又掙幾遠呢!(洗碟机始終係要塭位擺,手洗最多俾老婆話整濕個地.) - #41 [cpu8088], 10-12-06 08:42徳發偉X話隻LP play多10次8次啦 D微粒就會挑哂出嚟 is not 老點.
reasons being the more u play the statics will be eliminated gradually, plus your stylus will dig out the dirt thats at the bottom of the grooves and clean up the LPs. Of course each time you played u have to brush the surface of the LPs.
i cannot see how u accuse someone is 100% 老點. Perhaps u have not tried nor having the expertise in this area.
最後修改時間: 2010-12-06 08:45:05 - #40 [cpu8088], 10-12-06 08:39spyder
the shape of the diamond stylus is where the difference lies.
conical will have more contact area than elliptical or other fine line shapes. that is why conical stylus is cheaper and easier to make.
- #39 [BillySIU], 10-12-06 08:24
另外又聽徳發偉X話隻LP play多10次8次啦 D微粒就會挑哂出嚟 冇哂雜音家咧!
有時真係唔知係咪老點!
............................
100%係老點! - #38 [spyder], 10-12-06 07:01JBJim hing,
"之前用Denon103R都有幾多炒豆聲.但用咗Benz Mirco Glider SL之後就冇咗好好好多"
I don't understand, would you please explain more. A better stylus should "dig out" more signal from the LP groove, including 炒豆聲, right?
sorry, I just a starter on LP. - #37 [spyder], 10-12-06 06:57two model are basically same, just you prefer which outlook is better.
- #36 [ericcheng], 10-12-06 01:32JBJim hing
唔該晒師兄,我都打算買,我見秋記同Amari果部都係兩仟幾,諗緊買邊部,但早日前去秋記佢裝修要1月1日先開門,所以都係邊等邊諗,仲有樣想請教,請問有冇人知兩部邊部較好???
最後修改時間: 2010-12-06 01:34:15 - #35 [JBJim], 10-12-06 01:09More Picture
- #34 [JBJim], 10-12-06 01:07ericcheng兄
我用咗秋葉原隻洗碟機同洗碟水兩年多.在下300幾隻LP十年冇唱過得已從生.玩LP唔可以冇洗碟機嘅.洗完之後又靚仔又靚聲.當然貴嘅洗碟機我相信會更好.但我覺得呢都好底用囉.不過唱頭好緊要.之前用Denon103R都有幾多炒豆聲.但用咗Benz Mirco Glider SL之後就冇咗好好好多.
最後修改時間: 2010-12-06 01:09:18 - #33 [spong], 10-12-04 12:086、 發黴唱片的處理。對於已發黴或髒的唱片,切忌在未處理的情況下播放,因為黴菌和灰塵將在唱針與溝槽中擠壓,而使得音軌受傷。在經濟允許的範圍內可考慮買台洗唱片機。如須自己用手清洗,須準備洗臉盆一個.
-------------------------------------------------
尋晚試冼*江山美人LP* 用絨毛唱片刷大力刷 抹乾再用大風扇吹, 吹 又再用另一隻絨毛刷再刷....真係效果唔錯喎!
炒豆聲大淢之餘 s/n 都正埋.
今晚一於擺隻*江山美人*落桶水度浸二日一夜試下 不過研究緊掂樣protect張label紙唔濕. - #32 [spong], 10-12-04 10:23musicmachine 兄,
多謝意見 不過隻Dual仲用得 唔考慮換住.
其實我仲有個Rockson唱盤 不過覺得唔及Dual好聲 收埋佐. - #31 [musicmachine], 10-12-03 22:17spong師兄:
神嘅可以攞去整 問吓r33 fans 有冇師父讖整 買個新盤或二手都可
買個電子針磅可磅針重
最後修改時間: 2010-12-03 22:27:56 - #30 [ericcheng], 10-12-03 21:56旺角秋業原所賣的洗碟機,其實掂唔掂有冇師兄用緊????
- #29 [spong], 10-12-03 21:51唔該musicmachine兄,
不過都係冇用,個Dual支臂係神神地 個唱頭重量係靠手動 係靠估嘅! - #28 [musicmachine], 10-12-03 21:31shure 95ed 說明書上有寫唱重: 3/4 to 1-1/2 grams
- 下一頁 (3 of 5)
- 返回 ...
I used hand wash before but after 20 disc.... I bought a Classic 33. It is a copy-cat of VPI 16.5.
there was my figure-print on the LP if I use hand-wash. The center label cannot wet to long. The hair-dryer is danger to the LP when drying.
last, time spend on hand wash is much more then machine.