- #52 [lamlamlay], 20-07-15 10:41大家覺得換電源線比有源喇叭 提升大嗎
- #51 [lamlamlay], 20-07-14 16:19lfyeung 師兄 請問你用咩DAC 同PRE比PSI?
- #50 [lfyeung], 20-07-14 09:55我又比較保守,揀返用Class AB 傳統amp的有源喇叭,真係聽得出分別,特別是樂器的中高頻。
聽咗咁多年Class D, 由Tripath, TI, Yamaha, Infineon, ST, Nuforce, ICE power, Hypex... 係有進步,但同傳統Class AB 都係差啲啲。 -
- #49 [Richmond168], 20-07-14 01:30補相, AMIE 係全隻黑色的,放在四柱喇叭腳上的一對。由於agent 得一對做Demo, 所以俾返佢先,費事阻人做生意啦。
最後修改時間: 2020-07-14 01:36:58 - #48 [Richmond168], 20-07-14 01:25#13 、 15 師兄,
Sorry 最近太忙遲咗回覆。
我的喇叭係被一隻叫AMIE 嘅六吋兩路Studio Monitor 打敗的。Agent 話佢係一間美國加州叫Meyer Sound 的工廠為Star Wars 間錄音室特別造嘅,一次過已經訂咗幾百隻咁話喎。
今日去還返對喇叭俾觀塘間dealer, 佢哋老闆係我朋友,最近才取得銷售權。 佢求其用NAD Streamer 加專業小型Mixer, 講整體音效一定同小弟地方用SACD player 加前級有一段距離,但以佢咁嘅消費,已經好過唔少我聽過貴不少的組合。Dealer Showroom 相對細,聽大爆棚,甚至大爆炸,我估我耳膜穿佢都未有耐燒。但聽斯文嘢又好鬼真丶靚聲。 - #47 [Chan@review33], 20-07-13 23:27一個字低玩
由其係果d用細單元玩AV
又話要加呢樣加果樣後級嘅用家
一個5寸低音單元嘅 active speaker 已夠爆到耳鳴了 - #46 [長長影子], 20-07-13 20:57宜家嘅 active speaker 唔少都已經整合埋先進嘅 DSP 技術,如果自己技術有限去玩被動喇叭,就算使好多錢落去都追唔到 active speaker 原音精確嘅重播效果。
- #45 [dtseslok], 20-07-13 20:22kef ls50 wireless根本唔可以同定位,呢隻野應該係all in one果D,比電腦喇叭/藍牙喇叭高級
但應該點都唔係STUDIO ACTIVE MONITOR果類,"点解要玩有源喇叭"應該係講 Genelec, ATC, PSI , adam, krk, neumann果D,
最後修改時間: 2020-07-13 20:28:32 - #44 [KHS], 20-07-12 20:12在我角度上,有源喇叭是指 STUDIO ACTIVE MONITOR,KEF LS50 吾算,聽音樂不是只得味道,音埸,定位,分析力重要些
- #43 [DYreal], 20-07-10 21:32師兄講得完全對,因爲我嘅諗法如果純粹係家居嘅問題通常會揀小型有源喇叭比較多,呢類喇叭大多數都是多功能一體化底板。如果去到啲大型有源喇叭,其實呢個已經唔係家居空間嘅問題,而係口味嘅問題,如果佢裏邊係用傳統放大器推動,維修當然冇問題。
- #42 [lfyeung], 20-07-10 21:31維修方面,好多有源喇叭(特別係好聲嗰啲)要返原廠整,因為線路要調整去做一條平直的頻率曲線,維修都要有儀器和adjustment,但我用咗三年小問題都未出現過。
我聽過LS50 wireless,我接受唔到,啲聲唔得,不接近原音,聽流行曲還可以,classical music 立即搞唔掂。
自己聽過又覺得好的有源喇叭是:Genelec, ATC, PSI Audio. 最後我揀咗 PSI,純粹個人喜好 - #41 [hang0215], 20-07-10 21:29仲有所謂分體式壞amp導致燒喇叭都唔係咩新鮮事。所以結論係各有各好,各有支持者。
最後修改時間: 2020-07-10 21:32:34 - #40 [hang0215], 20-07-10 21:00#38
如果你淨係講Ls50 wireless呢類有源喇叭或者某程度啱嘅,但係都有好多有源喇叭係傳統class AB amp,唔一定壞咗冇得整。而且有獨立間隔畀份amp,所以未必如你所講咁。 - #39 [fotheringay], 20-07-10 20:55
I have two aspects for this topic.
I did run a pair Spendor BC1/2 Active speaker in the past. It was used by an ex-BBC engineer and I took ownership for a peanut because people seem to prefer non-active BC1. No idea why?
I had the BC1 teamed up with different preamps and directly to a CD player and a Phono Preamp. The results were not too bad. I later disconnect the active amp and ran it as normal BC1 because I wanted to try out different power amps and check the performance.
The second part to this topic is that I also use MacKie Mixer with the BC1 Active briefly and the result isn't too bad.
I use the mixer as a source selector mainly as it allows more inputs and individual gain adjustment which is quite handy.
Recording artist seem to use only one small active speaker for sound checking purpose especially only home recording. Obviously you can have Hi-End active speakers like those from ATC and Meridian.
I think if you want simplicity and saving space active speaker may be the way to go for especially some of them sound extremely well.
BC1A Active
BC1 non-active
Mackie Mixer
Allen & Heath Mixer - #38 [DYreal], 20-07-10 20:29其實呢個係相對嘅問題,舉個例KEF LS50 wireless 佢包含咗大多數數碼輸入接口(如DAC)、DAC、Wi-Fi模組、開關電源同埋D類放大器。一體化嘅設計好處就係慳地方和簡化系統(通常市場上都冇替代底板),唔好處就係如果專用零件損壞而又冇原廠零件維修嘅話基本上係total loss。就算俾你搵到替代品,因為喇叭裏面空間非常緊密亦都唔容易俾你裝到入去。但係如果因為家居嘅問題呢個可能係不二之選。
相對分體式嚟講,如果你特別喜歡對喇叭嘅音色就算其他環節有乜損壞都唔會影響喇叭嘅表現。傳統放大器可以維修嘅機接近100%,一如有位師兄成功維修幾部舊Krell機甚至改良裏面嘅穩壓線路,皆因有足夠嘅空間。
最後修改時間: 2020-07-10 20:32:26 - #37 [ich], 20-07-10 19:55#36
同意觀點。任何器材用得多都會損耗。唔用都會氧化。好少聽見人買HiFi要來留芳百世。調轉換器材就有。 Amp壞了就維修;active speakers內置 amp壞了就都維修。
不過少 D 發燒友"玩" studio mixing console。 Allen & Heath mixers幾靜、聲幾好。 - #36 [hang0215], 20-07-10 19:46#34
以此logic即係所有amp,cd機...等,都因為有機會壞而唔值得買嗎? - #35 [KHS], 20-07-10 19:06我對GENELEC 8030A 用咗八年多,一D問題都冇,越來越好聲,吾喜歡有源喇叭好多原因,覺得吾夠味道,視乎你喜歡聴音樂定聴音響,我喜歡原因是全頻平均,聲音凖確,分析力高
- #34 [DYreal], 20-07-10 18:44電子零件嘅壽命遠遠低於喇叭或者現代嗰啲喇叭單元。廠方為咗利潤更新換代比較頻密,所以我諗如果個喇叭過得一定年期都未必有原裝零件去維修。特別係嗰啲開關電源,你就算搵到替代品都未必能夠fit得返落去嗰個喇叭相關位置度。
如果放大組件被更換成其他產品,或者因為替代品令到裏面空間有變化,其實個聲效可能已經走樣。 - #33 [tonywong], 20-07-10 18:37如果可以重新搞過
我就玩有源
省位。省錢買線。省電。無咁熱
質素有咁上下。就收貨 - 下一頁 (2 of 4)
- 返回 ...