電視壞了,budget 大約6,xxx . 49 or 50吋

請指教那部好?

Panasonic TH-49FX600H
Sharp LC50S50H

or any suggestion?

謝謝



最後修改時間: 2018-08-13 22:58:19

兩者一定是 Panasonic, 五年上鬥修理, Sharp 己經放軟手腳了

tks comments

小弟部Pan，LZ8OO，十年，健在

我都買樂聲牌 TV, 仲大頭煆掉左連保單的紙盒, 如果保一年, 我就算了, 但包五年上門保修, 冇咁笨, 打電話去代理(信興), 個姐姐聽完我所說因由, 叫我 e-mail 買機單比佢睇, 照做, 幾日後收到重發的保單, 仲即時幫我登記埋保單資料, 服務一流, 抵讚!!

最後修改時間: 2018-08-14 17:40:35

我用Sharp Aquos七年到今日，完全未試過傷風鼻塞，畫面靚，色自然。
Optical出解碼去amp靚聲。

三叔及新力也不錯，值得一試

平嘢計　海信都OＫ架　聞說已佔世界銷量第二

https://www.hktvmall.com/hktv/zh/main/search?page=0&q=%3Arelevance%3Acategory%3AAA32401010000%3Azone%3Ahomenfamily%3Abrand%3AHISENSE%3Astreet%3Amain%3A

Heard that SHARP no longer invested in new Panel development
Now in the market, only Samsung. LG and Panasonic and China manufacturers still invested in developing new panel

In gist, IMHO
1 Samsung and Panasonic are in same level
2 LG and Sony are in same level
3 Mainland Brands

Unless you run AB test at the same time to compare, you cannot distinguish different in the performance in colour or sharpness. By the way, the function to adjust the color and sharpness of each model is very very detail now.

Thus, I prefer to budget-buy approach. vote 海信
I value that the expenditure for TV should less than $5000 :))))

If having $, surely go to Panasonic due to the post sales services and Japan made, if still possible.
Samsung, yes, the picture quality is the best. But it is also the most expensive. Due to the fact that Samasung has many models, hard to clarify the quality variances (in term of price) of different models. In other word, high chance to buy cheap quality with higher price. I trust Japan brand more than Korea brand.

By the way, don't trust the display effect in retail shop.




最後修改時間: 2018-08-15 09:17:11

有網友提過3星的售後服務差, 呢樣嚇怕人

#9 同意 我再買都係海信

差唔多嘢 反正 幾年就換
“Again, why pay more?”

panasonic 用 LG 面版
sony 用 samsung 面版, 但唔鍾意佢部機好熱
Sharp 已是被富士康收購
用緊 Hisence 快5年, 日日開10個鐘以上, 假明15個鐘, 完全唔覺得熱

當年要平所以買LG，用咗六年冇病冇痛，吾閞冷氣都吾覺熱喎！



最後修改時間: 2018-08-16 05:17:10

請問除了Sony,LG有內置Netflix,其他哪一款電視會有,thanks