- #29 [BenYC], 21-04-21 20:53
- #28 [phil.ng], 21-04-21 20:53DG58 或 Tact 都可以
- #27 [Andy3210], 21-04-21 20:47
-
- #26 [BenYC], 21-04-21 19:15What is DG58?
- #25 [Andy3210], 21-04-21 18:45想請教係咪用 DG58那一類?
- #24 [BenYC], 21-04-21 18:03Actually 2 things can make life easier: pick a speaker that is highly efficient with wide dispersement angle, put more furniture into the listening environment.
Then there is not much need to go complicated ways in order to get decent sound.
I wish I knew earlier.....
最後修改時間: 2021-04-21 18:04:51 - #23 [Ck2007], 21-04-21 17:56加埋Room correction更明顯改善環境影響或器材缺陷都有幫助. 現代已有很多方案、有平有貴.
準備重新投入中 - #22 [phil.ng], 21-04-21 16:47另一方法丶都是 hi-end 玩法
因所有喇叭在不同房都有不同曲缐
https://audiophilestyle.com/forums/topic/31852-best-dsp-hardware/
"suggest you insert your DSP prior to your DCS upsampler. This way, all the processing is done in the digital domain with no conversion to analog. Unfortunately, I do not know whether this will prevent your DCS Vivaldi from being able to "pull" music from your NAS - something you would have to research. "
最後修改時間: 2021-04-21 16:50:54 - #21 [15--16], 21-04-21 16:10#10: 同意,如果沒有一個喇叭可以全聲頻平直發音的話,電子分音及多部後級放大器是維一得到高度傳音的方法!
- #20 [kevin3770], 21-04-21 15:371.7k以上準確來講應該係淨高頻,1.7k樓下係中低頻。
- #19 [phil.ng], 21-04-21 15:33數年後 Krell 出了大力power amp, 發現一部夠級數的全贏兩部下一級的
低音最明顯丶有了好的低音托住丶音場都靚好多丶爆時又勁過兩部細amp
所以不如玩高一級的一部過丶慳了條power cord, 接線(極影響另一部的音色)
不過超級富豪除外、两部頂班一定好過一部
最後修改時間: 2021-04-21 15:38:30 - #18 [phil.ng], 21-04-21 15:23幾十年前丶Krell 成名作 KSA50, 推英國喇叭丶因喜歡當年 Krell 的A類"美"聲
但音場不級其他大力 AB 類
之後買多部丶biamp, 丶當年覺得又甜又開揚.......以為是終極........
最後修改時間: 2021-04-21 15:25:08 - #17 [Andy3210], 21-04-21 15:07A30推高中 合併推低音?
- #16 [kevin3770], 21-04-21 14:17依家用緊PMC Fact 8,分頻點係1.7k,用金仔 C2410前級,A30後級同埋另外一部金仔合併機當後級,分別推高頻與低頻,實測好聲過一部前級加單一部後級。
最後修改時間: 2021-04-21 14:17:50 - #15 [Andy3210], 21-04-20 17:51其實叫吾好既朋友, 有幾多位真正買過BI_AMP玩?
- #14 [長長影子], 20-05-20 15:37比起玩電分,線、電容嗰啲影響其實已經不外如事。 可以參考吓我之前 DSP 分音嘅分享。 如果仲係只係靠換電容、電線嗰啲嚟玩 hifi 而唔係針對問題對症下藥,某程度上其實仲係畀 hifi 玩緊。
https://www.review33.com/avforum/index.php?topic=32171213232155&item=&page=1
最後修改時間: 2020-05-20 15:52:24 - #13 [phil.ng], 20-05-20 15:28兩路丶吾同線丶吾同amp, 除非伱冇耳丶否則上下不夾丶一聴就知
就算什麼都一樣丶一部換過電容也不同聲
分頻在耳朵敏感位 - #12 [長長影子], 20-05-20 15:22用一般放大器,兩部放大器嘅頻寬、速度不一樣其實唔會係問題,最大問題主要都係兩台之間嘅 gain 及 xover 嘅 phase shift 等等,單單 driver 與 driver 聲點之間嘅距離影響已經比喱個放大器所謂嘅速度差異大好多。
最後修改時間: 2020-05-20 15:32:34 - #11 [DYreal], 20-05-20 15:03喇叭分音器嘅設計通常基與同一個信號去到喇叭接口。如果而家分開兩部不同放大器,因為兩部放大器嘅特性唔同(先唔好講嗰放大率是否一至),兩部放大器嘅頻寬、速度不一樣,放大後嘅信號去到高低音喇叭接口可能都已經不一致。噉喇叭本身原先設計嘅特性就已經不能滿足,喇叭出嚟嘅聲已經同以前不一樣。
最後修改時間: 2020-05-20 15:04:29 - #10 [jimmyihv], 20-05-20 13:50Electronic crossover with multiple power amps is the ultimate hifi solution.
- 下一頁 (1 of 2)
- 返回 ...
This DG68 is an equalizer. It is more like an tone control. If you are asking about active crossover, you need something like Ashly 4.8SP.
If you are asking about flattening the room response.... This is theoretically sounding. Yet, in real life, many ends up inviting a tiger in to drive out a dog.
最後修改時間: 2021-04-21 20:56:47