- #1 [dominique], 10-04-22 11:06
- #2 [CKL2], 10-04-22 11:41Hi dominique,
Do you know if I2S output is available? - #3 [michael23], 10-04-22 12:38呢篇文以前都睇過~見到好多外國FOURM都走去買部JVC返黎拆
-
- #4 [dominique], 10-04-22 12:41Hi CKL2,
There is no I2S output in original 47 lab design.
The 47 lab's design is to pair to NOS (non over-sampling) DAC; i.e. no I2S output is required.
No sure if DIYer can add the IS2 interface through PCB's LC78601 or LC78622.
Regards,
Dominique - #5 [朋友號], 10-04-22 13:17好多外國FOURM都走去買部JVC返黎拆....can find it from China SHZ?
- #6 [CKL2], 10-04-22 13:17Most people would agree I2S is better than SPDIF. People learned how to tag I2S from CD-Pro2. :)
- #7 [elo], 10-04-22 13:51
- #8 [elo], 10-04-22 13:54
- #9 [dominique], 10-04-22 14:18Hi CKL2,
Do agree that IS2 has its' benefit while IS2 specification can only support a very short distance.
I have modified my Logitech SqueezeBox with IS2 support. It is a very intersting project but not many DAC support IS2.
The current 2 DAC I am using already cannot support IS2; Weiss DAC2 & 47 Lab Gemini.
Let me know if you interest on my Logitech SqueezeBox with IS2 support .... :-)
最後修改時間: 2010-04-22 14:20:33 - #10 [CKL2], 10-04-22 15:32Yes, the major concern of I2S is the short distance. I don't have an I2S DAC as well. You are an experienced DIYer.
- #11 [dominique], 10-04-22 15:52Hi CKL2,
I am just a Music lover, cannot afford much time on DIY.
I used to my Logitech SqueezeBox to a Clock correction device through I2S and then connect to a DAC through SPDIF.
Make a great improvement on SqueezeBox performance. - #12 [Go4fun.], 10-04-22 16:13HiFi .......just a joke ....
- #13 [dominique], 10-04-22 17:21As a 47 lab lover, I will say it is an art to use such cheap components to achieve such sonic result ...... :-)
- #14 [metaphysicalist], 10-04-23 16:10Dears,
I am the blogger of this article.
Finally, I have built my own Shigaclone last month.
The unit is cheap and sound is surprisingly impressive.
The DIY details and more photos are published in another post:
http://cynicalaudio.blogspot.com/2010/04/shigaclone-cd-transport.html
Shigaclone is absolutely worth to try.
最後修改時間: 2010-04-23 16:15:17 - #15 [tingmoon], 24-07-10 12:4047 lab在香港唔流行
可惜 - #16 [rcwy], 24-07-13 16:54
Any update of the blogger's cloning exercise(s) ?
I actually have a Shigaraki CD transport and am happy with its sound. It is not expensive. 10 years ago it was priced below $20K.
Yes, the Shigaraki is a relatively simple and basic CD transport. Its remote control offers very limited control functions. No direct access to a track and one has to forward one by one to a track. From this perspective, $20K is not cheap. But from the pure music, it is well worth the money! - #17 [hahayanyan], 24-07-13 17:51嘩記得兩年幾錢幫朋友買一部47 lab, 唔記得咗咩型號嘅前級, test 咗幾個鐘頭, 印象深刻, not bad
- #18 [CodyChan], 24-07-13 17:58小!又係福頭丁滿!
一有人支持就狂推舊貼!
收皮啦死丁滿!
小你 有本事就自己出貼啦!
最後修改時間: 2024-07-13 18:00:33 - #19 [hahayanyan], 24-07-13 18:06Haha 大部分情況之下都冇留意到 old dead or active
只係睇嘅主題有冇趣, 真係佩服Moon, 佢應該有幾個身份, 唔知佢有冇一個身份 係正常同人 交流吹水
行為固然有點點唔coom, 但係有可能動機善良, 有冇咩破壞力
Haha
最後修改時間: 2024-07-13 18:08:41 - #20 [JCR33], 24-07-13 18:08Richard and haha,
Didn't know you guys also fans of 47...
I still have a few Shiga
最後修改時間: 2024-07-13 18:14:10 - 下一頁 (1 of 4)
- 返回 ...
Shigaclone 最早從波蘭的音響討論區 www.audiostereo.pl 肇始。有人拆解 47 Lab 原廠的 Shigaraki CD-Transport,發現內部的機構和伺服模組,與便宜的 JVC RC-EZ31 手提音響雷同。於是有人開始去買 JVC 的手提音響,取出內部機構,配合高品質的電源和穩固的機座,結果得到不錯的表現。後來,加拿大 DIY 名人 Peter Daniel 又將這個資訊引薦到英語世界,在 diyAudio 引領熱烈的討論。
Peter Daniel 不愧是手藝精湛,非常有行動力的玩家。從去年三月到現在,短短一年間,他已經測試了許多種電源架構和機體結構,讓他的 Shigaclone 日益成熟。直到現在,他聲稱他的 Shigaclone 表現非常優異,不但超越了他研究多年的 CD-Pro 2 轉盤,還成為他的 reference 轉盤。
我過去一年密切地觀察 Peter 的進展,如今看來,去年年底的組態已經相當成熟了。從照片看起來,真是相當精緻,架構卻又是那麼地簡單。
JVC RC-EZ31 簡單廉價的 CD 讀取架構,理論上不會比 Philip CD-Pro 2 好。但正因為簡單,容易使用,所以對於技術能力不高,儀器設備不足的 DIYer 來說,反而比 CD-Pro 2 更容易做出好的結果。這也和 non-oversampling TDA1543 很容易就有好聲是相同的道理。
總之,玩 Shigaclone 比 CD-Pro 2 便宜多了,卻似乎更有趣,更好玩。我也很想買台 JVC RC-EZ31 來試試看,但國內似乎沒有進這個 model。卻不知道國內有沒有其他手提音響使用了相同的讀取機構呢?
http://cynicalaudio.blogspot.com/2009/04/47-labsshigaclone.html