＞請問classD amp d聲有咩問題？

當然唔會有問題, 更唔會聽到死人.
問題係個感受, 享受是否一樣無分別.
用阿里加因出火, 同用個吹氣里加因出火,
結果都是一樣, 比你出火......

只係, 你覺得係一樣既, 咁咪一樣lor .

論到講　ｃｌａｓｓ　ｄ，
INPUT SINGNAL 變成脈衝，　即好一個　ｂａｌｌ　紋比您　９成方紋，　雖然話唔覺，　ｃｄ　舊時都話　２０ｋｈｚ後唔覺，　您地話呢？

very short interval between the on and off states　呢個黃金時間又係唔覺？

quantisation error 又唔覺？

唔覺，　唔覺，　買部mini hifi 啦

Anybody working in Linn?? How much effort the done that you see! I only see they paid a lot on the ad. only!! $$$$$$$!!

Naim ??? 我幾乎唔記得o左吨雃~有多.

走hi end 路線,
但就走到不見經傳, 不知所謂.
都唔知坉茼悛O點攪既 !
可能吤峓@自娛吧 ! ..........^_^

Linn 除o左唱盤叫做OK, 好似無好野出過 !

我其實唔係好明大家點解對數碼 Amp 有咁大反應，事實係數碼 Amp 的確在市場上有一段時間，但二十年前的數碼 Amp 和現在的數碼 Amp 音色上是否一樣？ 在未有數碼 Amp 前 o係酒樓叫阿乜生請聽一線o個D , 同o係街頭賣唱o個部Amp 又係用也野放大技術？

大家玩音響都係想聽音樂，用乜放大技術係咪咁重要？

World is changing , take it or leave it . 30 years ago , we don't have email , why every one is using email to day , or we could stick to write a letter and send it off at the post office , and don't forget to put stamps on the envelope . Again the world is changing , take it or leave it !!!

Technology changes human's life and life style , that's fact of life , take it or leave it !

Sam 大哥，　無他，　大家都係到發揚五四精神，
最後結論都可能係去馬，　不過技術成熟未，　亦或傷人想搵　＄．

而且現在零件重係得數間公司，真係部部　ａｍｐ　除時得一把聲，　如下，　好野黎價
http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes.cfm/appnote_number/624/ln/en

I agree there is more room for digital amp to improve.

問題根源應該係本身audio中, 存在有幾個重使用者疊範疇和類型.
1. 玩音響..... 追求hi fidelity. 首歌好唔好聽其次.
2. 聽音樂..... 純粹要舒服relax 感覺. 唔洗咁hi fi.
3. 聽樂章..... 喜歡某類樂曲樂章遜L質素及效果.
4. 人有我有... 有聲出就 OK. bass砰砰聲就係勁同正, 高音 fee fee 聲就收貨.

亦因為有不同用家要求, 所以就有討論既points.

I don't know about the Class for Amp.
For the sound quality, the Flying Mole DAD M100 pro has good performance.
vivid and dynamic...

Yes,Ditital amp.=mini hifi都好聲.
HDMI=人人都識駁機,慳返好多買線錢...
^ ^
(~V~)
/|___|
/

"World is changing , take it or leave it ."

科技係比人用的.,吾洗問乜理由,若果人聽落吾岩聽.,呢個科技就要收檔!!世上不知幾多萬種科技就係咁收檔!!膽機係100年前產品lu.,world 係 change 喎.,但居然咁多人用呢!?

同意....世上不知幾多萬種科技就係咁收檔!!

留聲機, 錄音帶, cd 都危危乎.

但tube audio 就踏入第三個世紀. 咁你地點睇 ?

" halcro根本就係得個本音響技術吹(多廣告嘛).,我當然聽過啦!!咪音色偏泠,中音溥囉!!呢的係class D的恃色,吾好話同甲類比!就算好多英國做得較好的乙類機都好聲過! "

seems the halcro brought out the sonic characteristics of the preamp used. do you remember what preamp was used? have you tried with different preamps?

唔係喇 ........

不如我地都一齊吹埋一份,
等D 傻仔拿呇ad 甚麼馬蘭士, 麥景圖, 西電呀等 出黎濺賣, 到時就同呇a以收爛銅咁既重量計去收機, 咁咪肥仔水lor !........ ^_^

Been a musician in the past , the way I look at music and Digital Amp:

Industry Grade = Studio type, it tells every truth , it is not nesessary present to listen to , it classified as raw material , it is very rough usually.

Domestic HiFi = Easy to listen to from a comsumer's point of view, owning to domestic consumers can not accept such " Raw and rough " music , therefore clever businessmen they did a lot of tricks in mixing process , in order to modify the raw material to a more beautiful music.

Digital amp has been used in Studio and recording industry for quite some time , but it may not be acceptable to every one , especially for those who never been in the music industry and spend their entire life with ordinary domestic music equipments ( in every day terms they call it hifi ), therefore Digital amp has to convert their sound some how to suit ordinary consumer's market , in other wards Digital amps has to be colourated for ordinary consumers, or by saying to be improved. but the fact is to be colourated , and make it more sound like domestic sound rather then studio sound.

＞或者個題目寫錯,hi-fi市場係唔會玩完,各有所求,D机越出越差,人人都受落就得囉!

同意....x2

有人好享受o係公廁門口食野, 呇a話咁至叫做有風味.
有人只要係有個窿就滿足. 玩到笑騎騎 ! 都唔知幾開心 !
所謂各有各要求, 各自各精彩 !

數碼相機的相片質素一樣比唔上菲林，但前景一片光明。
因為市場主導

若一個產品或技術是完美的根本唔會有空間比第二個產品或技術出現。如果 Class A 係完美，就唔會有 Class AB。物競天擇適者生存、不成巧庣L時的產品必會被汰換，說甚麼也改變不了。

"D机越出越差,人人都受落就得囉!" 唔同意，越出越差只係一 D 人看法，事實係 D 機越出越好，只是有些人喜觀舊的聲音，正如有些人喜聲膽機的偶次諧波失真，太闊的頻寬也也不喜歡。