- #61 [Phil.ng], 21-03-16 17:43再看二出二丶出入一樣粗
- #62 [Phil.ng], 21-03-16 17:491603 的內心
- #63 [Phil.ng], 21-03-16 18:23Extreme clear 是粗過 clear
Extreme clear 一定有綱丶看來再粗點
Extreme clear 貴過 clear 50%,
會不會因此搞亂
最後修改時間: 2021-03-16 18:25:53 -
- #64 [Phil.ng], 21-03-16 18:27Picture extreme clear
- #65 [Phil.ng], 21-03-16 18:32這是 clear biwire, 看看biwire 後,個心幾細
- #66 [Phil.ng], 21-03-16 19:38From AudioQuest
“BiWiring Within a Single Cable:
Another valid BiWire option (with proper cable design) involves the use of a single speaker cable divided into separate “high” and “low” frequency sections. We call this Single BiWire (SBW). This works better with some cables than with others – but BiWiring using two separate cables is always better. We do not recommend Single BiWire when using a Star- Quad model (Type-2, Type-4, CV-4). More importantly, please understand that, except for the Rocket and Flat-Rock Series, it is better to use two less expensive cables than to Single BiWire with one better cable. Using two pairs of CV-8 is better than a Single BiWired Mont Blanc, for example.”
“Magnetic Fields and Bass Energy:
When using a single full-range speaker cable (not BiWiring) the large amounts of bass energy carried within the single cable has an adverse effect on the upper frequencies. In a BiWire set-up the cable feeding the
higher frequencies no longer handles the large mHaFgnetic fields caused by Network
the high current needed to produce bass. BiWiring does not affect the bass fundamentals, but the treble signal now travels a less disturbed path. It’s a
Power Connecting Cable
littleAlmikpelifitehre difference between swimming through waves versus through smooth water. Bass frequencies will sound better because bass definition
is actually located in the midrange and higher freLFquencies. . It is always Network
worthwhile to take advantage of the benefits of BiWiring when the speaker
manufacturer has gone to the extra expense of providing this capability. The
performance benefits of reducing distortion in this way are substantial.
Conventional Amplifier-speaker wiring.”
最後修改時間: 2021-03-16 19:51:40 - #67 [Phil.ng], 21-03-16 19:49
- #68 [mm452], 21-03-16 20:01半條的疑惑已解開了
- #69 [Bobby], 21-03-16 22:50原來如此,得益良多。
- #70 [Phil.ng], 21-03-16 22:55重要的一段
When BiWiring, the two (bass and treble) cables must either be identical, or have essentially identical geometries. If the cables have different geom- etries they will have different capacitance and inductance. Capaci- tance and inductance are the values used to create a loudspeaker’s low-pass and high-pass filter networks, together making a crossover. Having different values in the two cables effectively redesigns the crossover...not a good thing! The integrity and coherence of the speaker will be compromised. - #71 [BenYC], 21-03-16 22:55問一個整容醫生外表自然順眼好,定似韓星好?@_@”
- #72 [peter827], 21-03-16 23:21天生麗質的話,化妝都覺俗氣。
- #73 [Bobby], 21-03-17 06:20多謝各師兄指教
我的疑問,變數都產生了答案,沒有對與錯,可由喜好決定接線方式。
我會選擇用二對同品牌,型號,長度玩bi-wire,加強質感仍保存原有音色。 - #74 [Phil.ng], 21-03-17 11:15煲 bi 少少經驗
選好第一對丶煲六個月才決定是不是你杯茶
之後買多對丶煲時將舊放高丶新放低
原因是"熟了"那條放高音不吉耳丶用低音煲新丶快點熟丶這樣煲biwire 時仍可享受聴音樂丶未熟的低只是吾夠放及吾夠低丶耳朵易接受
最後修改時間: 2021-03-17 11:26:10 - #75 [chhnpng], 21-03-17 11:25點樣為之“essentially identical geometries”?我用緊對siltech 550L行高青,770L行低音,咁会唔会有"different capacitance and inductance"?
- #76 [Phil.ng], 21-03-17 11:42二路就不應用不同型號
From Audioquest
"This “trick” does not work for 2-way speakers. They have their BiWire access frequency in or above the midrange ... music and voice and practically everything else is in the midrange and must be given full respect. When Bi-Wiring with 2-way speakers always use two identical cables."
最後修改時間: 2021-03-17 11:50:27 - #77 [Phil.ng], 21-03-17 11:59Siltech 550,770 是45度扭丶即identical geometry
770 粗點丶同合金丶低音量會多點丶是自己tune 聲放法之一
如要全面厚身點丶上面也用770,三路最明顯丶因中音質感提升左 - #78 [Phil.ng], 21-03-17 12:03Siltech 與這就不同geometry
- #79 [Phil.ng], 21-03-17 12:07另一類。A
- #80 [Phil.ng], 21-03-17 12:08B
其實 A丶B是不同geometry - 下一頁 (4 of 6)
- 返回 ...