ReVox B225 可以play到 CDR/CDRW了； 多謝！幾位師兄指教！

anyone using ReVox B225 play CDR?

我新入了一台 REVOX B225, play 吾到CDR

網上有人說好易搞到？真可以？

https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-source/219358-revox-b225-2.html

951所有野同950一模一樣(我以為),我曾擁有一部,正式負資產.

cd880,cdm1頭,用原裝電源線
cd850,cdm4頭.電源線用大陸平線diy.
衹玩頭,兩部機都加同一解碼,用同一係統.

850 mk2我就無比較過,950(已換clock,627am,電容),960,880,226s每部機都用同一電源線直焊機內,直接接在電源蘇底,在加同一解碼同一系統.結果950輸好遠,不論分析力,密度,音樂感都輸,差2級,好明顯聽得到同其它3部的差別,其他cdm1相差很少,要好留心才聽到

玩線好過玩機啦

玩線好過玩機啦

兩部都重,但880稍重.840就輕.

經過來回測試,cdm1讓唔起cdm4一條幾舊水既土炮電線

cd880,cdm1頭,用原裝電源線
cd850,cdm4頭.電源線用大陸平線diy.
衹玩頭,兩部機都加同一解碼,用同一係統.

估下邊部靚?

It is more appropriate to say which kind of sound character you like more instead of which is better. It is very difficult to say how the Philips chipset engineer decide what objective they have in mind to produce such design in both analog and digital. Surely there were marketing influence behind.

Technically the analog stage of Revox B225 and B226S were aimed for different generation music trend as well as gear matching purpose. Philips 850 CD was almost the last audiophile CDP by the company. Judging from the selling price now and then; Revox is almost 2 time higher than 850MKII
just to reflect the build quality and market segment in real world.

For my personal choice; I would recommend B226S instead of the other 2 for a few reasons:

a)it used CDM4 which is easier for future maintenance.
b)it has digital output for connection to dac.
c) the S series employed best components from Revox engineers for critical music reproduction; particular the power transformer it used.
d)it can take remote control.
e)the stylish faceplate.
f)very good resell value and a seek-after item for many experienced audiophiles.

Lets get back to music and enjoy.



最後修改時間: 2011-05-06 15:35:47

講到比較,明顯靜晒.唔通言語溝通有問題?
我玩hifi咁耐都係咁玩,既然無回應就作罷.

b225- typical sound,
b226s - details but lack of warmth and so called 'FEELING"
The result is B225 wins.

-------------

B226S是 B226系內最出色的巔峯之作,無論在幼滑度、分析力、細緻度、音場、音樂味、高低延伸、都遠在 B225 之上,只有人聲的濃度,是 B225的強項,同系機14 bit VS 16 bit,連爭論都不需要。
_________________________

可能配搭唔同致出現唔同評價.
但我傾向後者,因聽過b226s後,逐在ebay買入b225,但失望.

其實好或唔好都無所謂, 機又唔係我做.
認真既也可來一場"盲聽"比較,好過口舌分高下.
如證明你地玩得好,我也從中學到野.

Studer 727 好聲但是 Studer A730

B225 should be better than 850MK1 or 850MKII, agreed x10000000

B225 vs 850 MKI/II ----- 冇得比

B225 vs B226S ----- B225 味道係 ok正, B226S是 B226系內最出色的巔峯之作,無論在幼滑度、分析力、細緻度、音場、音樂味、高低延伸、都遠在 B225 之上,只有人聲的濃度,是 B225的強項,同系機14 bit VS 16 bit,連爭論都不需要。

有傳,725才是極品,聽吓就算!

但說 B225朦聲,check 吓套機好啦!

我用過不少 Revox器材,我都仲有佢 70年代嘅機種,朦聲?未試過!



最後修改時間: 2011-05-05 21:03:34

兩部都玩過,B225聽人聲 is good,聽classic B226 is prefect!
But I don't think they are 朦聲! It is 老聲!
Try to use different power cord to 教聲

我曾慕名買入Revox B225, 厚朦老聲,高段"著草".
不敵我另一部cd850mk1

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Have you try to use different power cord? It will made you surprise !

B225 should be better than 850MK1 or 850MKII, agreed x2

why not choose Studer A727 ? you will get more surprise !

B225 should be better than 850MK1 or 850MKII, I used all before and now keep B225.

可能我部B225真係不在狀態, 來一場盲聽比較會中肯d.