- #16 [ET], 15-02-18 01:46
- #15 [w.lo.bc], 15-02-18 00:50If is from phono to preamp, or turntable to pre or phono, the shorter the better due to noise issue. if it is from pre to power amp, 1 or 1.5, I don't think I can hear any difference but I will go for longer one just in case if I need to rearrange my audio equipment, 1.5m will be more practical.
- #14 [Kenny], 15-02-17 23:34依到有幾多個人真係試過1米,1米半,二米分別先 ?
-
- #13 [wadiadac], 15-02-17 23:281.5M, 1M D聲會比較緊,經驗之談.
- #12 [Ming Sir], 15-02-17 23:251.825 米(道聽途說)
最後修改時間: 2015-02-17 23:37:20 - #11 [徐福], 15-02-17 22:15以物理學來說.是越短越好.
但有些C Hing.做過多重測試.認為是1.5m 最好. - #10 [Kenny], 15-02-17 20:52線一定係越短越好
尤其係RCA線, 越長就越似一條天線, 收理好多雜声, 會好嘈!
仲有,唔係毎部機都可以推長線, 當然1,5M平機都無問題 - #9 [ikikik], 15-02-17 16:23一條良好的原廠線,長短也應該冇分別,因為一切已在設計之内。
- #8 [mrbeansr], 15-02-17 11:36線就是改善與有音染,所以1.5m比較有多d效果.
1.5m 好點.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
如果線係衰聲, 係咪越長越衰? - #7 [yyaudio], 15-02-17 11:18同意#6,皇帝位距喇叭越遠,訊號線越短越好
- #6 [zoneaudio], 15-02-17 11:13理論上相同物料比較短嘅訊號線在電感,電容,電阻都比較長嘅優勝,即係對訊號影響比較少,不過音響呢家嘢有人嘅感觀,未必短就是最好
- #5 [olivea88], 15-02-17 11:08線就是改善與有音染,所以1.5m比較有多d效果.
1.5m 好點. - #4 [mrbeansr], 15-02-17 10:05師兄神級金耳朵.
- #3 [伏喱哩], 15-02-17 09:34DIY 1.375M
- #2 [kwe], 15-02-17 08:39Shd be 1.25m
- #1 [wongkim], 15-02-17 01:28正常一條RCA線同牌子lM定1.5M好聲?
- 返回 ...
以物理角度講, 線係冇增益, 只有衰減. 越長衰減越大. 冇乜道理長會好過短.
有人講長好過短, 一係線廠或代理鋪頭講 >> 越長賣得越貴嘛. 一係用家器材或線本身問題 >> 線長衰減大左, 可能把聲出黎冇咁利柔順D.