蝗國真厲害，整到劉曉波近死，現在請美國及德國專家到來醫，可能一星期後同美國學生一樣回國即死，到時話死在專家的手中。

唔好美化佢，蝗國唔係真厲害，係無人性至啱

係鬼計, 一切盡在精算中!

用不人道手法整頓自己同胞，我相信全世界只有蝗國先做得出！

做得出亦做得夠絕！

咁先仆街冚家剷

仆街共產黨，唔滅黨天無眼！

放消息即話係末期，即係初期發現隱瞞。

禾情願係邪惡組織借呢個症俾下台階放小波出鬼国而唔係真有此症

只係雜種去見默克爾前的一個虛偽行為
我相信佢一返北京不久, 劉曉波夫婦可以一齊去德國

你拎左 諾貝爾！仲想我放你走？！




最後修改時間: 2017-07-05 22:31:09

一個最嚴謹有文化肯面對自己歷史的先進民族接待一個黑社會流...

最後修改時間: 2017-07-05 22:38:18

[#10]

挪威頒左個獎，都要中共配合，俾你有機會捨身就義，先至叫實至名歸

依家劉曉波(好不幸)真係實至名歸了，唉

病情似乎轉差
中共是殺人兇手!

好瘦....

中共是殺人兇手! X2

令人齒冷的政權

https://www.theguardian.com/comm ... o-chinese-dissident



In recent weeks, Nobel prizewinner Liu Xiaobo's politics have been reduced to a story of a heroic individual who upholds human rights and democracy. His views are largely omitted to avoid a discussion about them, resulting in a one-sided debate. Within three weeks, in Hong Kong, for example, more than 500 articles were published about Liu, of which only 10 were critical of the man or peace prize.

In China, before the award, most people neither knew nor cared about Liu, while, according to Andrew Jacobs, writing in the International Herald Tribune, an "official survey of university students taken since the prize was awarded found that 85% said they knew nothing about Mr Liu and Charter '08." A Norwegian Sinologist has elicited comments from Chinese people and indicated that younger Chinese still do not care about Liu. Older Chinese intellectuals are interested in discussing the award, but many do not think Liu is an appropriate recipient.

Imprisoning Liu was entirely unnecessary. If Liu's politics were well-known, most people would not favour him for a prize, because he is a champion of war, not peace. He has endorsed the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, and he applauded the Vietnam and Korean wars retrospectively in a 2001 essay. All these conflicts have entailed massive violations of human rights. Yet in his article Lessons from the Cold War, Liu argues that "The free world led by the US fought almost all regimes that trampled on human rights … The major wars that the US became involved in are all ethically defensible." During the 2004 US presidential election, Liu warmly praised George Bush for his war effort against Iraq and condemned Democratic party candidate John Kerry for not sufficiently supporting the US's wars:

[T]he outstanding achievement made by Bush in anti-terrorism absolutely cannot be erased by Kerry's slandering … However much risk must be endured in striking down Saddam Hussein, know that no action would lead to a greater risk. This has been proven by the second world war and September 11! No matter what, the war against Saddam Hussein is just! The decision by President Bush is right!

Liu has also one-sidedly praised Israel's stance in the Middle East conflict. He places the blame for the Israel/Palestine conflict on Palestinians, who he regards as "often the provocateurs".

Liu has also advocated the total westernisation of China. In a 1988 interview he stated that "to choose westernisation is to choose to be human". He also faulted a television documentary, He Shang, or River Elegy, for not thoroughly criticising Chinese culture and not advocating westernisation enthusiastically enough: "If I were to make this I would show just how wimpy, spineless and f__ked-up [weisuo, ruanruo, caodan] the Chinese really are". Liu considered it most unfortunate that his monolingualism bound him in a dialogue with something "very benighted [yumei] and philistine [yongsu]," the Chinese cultural sphere. Harvard researcher Lin Tongqi noted that an early 1990s book by Liu contains "pungent attacks on the Chinese national character". In a well-known statement of 1988, Liu said:

It took Hong Kong 100 years to become what it is. Given the size of China, certainly it would need 300 years of colonisation for it to become like what Hong Kong is today. I even doubt whether 300 years would be enough.

Affirming this sentiment in Open magazine in 2006, he added that progress in China depends on westernisation and the more westernisation, the more progress. While his supporters excuse Liu's pro-colonialism as a provocation, it logically aligns with his support for total westernisation and US-led regime changing wars.
Advertisement

Liu, in his "Charter '08", called for a Western-style political system in China and privatisation of all enterprises and farm land. Not surprisingly, the organisations he has headed received financial support from the US government's National Endowment for Democracy. Studies show, however, that where transitions to electoral democracy occur in countries with low levels of average wealth, the rule of law does not necessarily follow, but instability and low levels of development do. Neither does electoral democracy deliver good governance, nor even sustain itself under such conditions.

Nowhere in the post-communist or developing world has there been the fair privatisation Liu claims to seek. Privatisation in eastern Europe often led to massive thefts of public property by oligarchs and became deeply unpopular, with strong majorities of people in all post-Communist countries wanting its revision. Privatisation is also disliked in India, Latin America and China itself, while studies of privatisation in many parts of the world show it can have a deleterious effect on development. Land privatisation in China would rapidly create land concentration and landless peasants.

Forty years ago, a Nobel prize committee upheld formerly imprisoned writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn as a symbol of freedom against the Soviet regime. As with Liu, it may have been unaware of or chose to ignore Solzhenitsyn's classically reactionary views: his own version of authoritarianism, an animus toward Jews, denunciation of the US for not pursuing the war in Vietnam more vigorously, condemnation of Amnesty International as too liberal, and support for the Spanish fascist dictator Francisco Franco.

The Nobel peace prize is a prize for politics of certain kind. The Norwegian Nobel Institute director has noted that the Nobel Committee has most often selected "those who had spoken out ... against the Communist dictators in Moscow and the dictators in Beijing." French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre recognized the Nobel prizes' role in the Cold war and refused to accept one in 1964. He stated: "In the present situation, the Nobel Prize stands objectively as a distinction reserved for the writers of the West or the rebels of the East." That role has been continued with Liu's prize.

睇完#16真心覺得應該頒個和平獎比老共政權，老毛，老鄧，老江，老胡，由老習代領。不過被頒和平獎即係馬上同曉波同志同級，老習又敢唔敢去領獎呢？？

應該頒個最佳豬農獎比中共. 佢可以將人養成豬, 仲係非常之無恥的豬.

唉! 殺人政權




【劉曉波肝癌】醫生要求家屬24小時守候 野渡：我們或將失去曉波

患末期肝癌的諾貝爾和平獎得主劉曉波，正在瀋陽中國醫科大學第一附屬醫院治療，其家屬透露昨日劉的情況急轉直下，肝功能變差，承受不了治療，目前已經停用所有中、西醫抗癌藥。「我們可能就要失去曉波了」劉曉波之友野渡向記者透露，通過劉的家屬確認，醫生已要求家屬24小時standby。「還沒發病危通知，但實際就是那個意思了。」野渡說。

家屬指出，醫生周一曾為劉曉波抽走1,000毫升腹部積水，情況稍為好轉，但昨日情況急轉直下，由解放軍八一醫院副院長、全軍腫瘤中心主任秦叔逵，及北京協和醫院肝膽外科主任醫師毛一雷率領的專家組，再次到瀋陽為劉曉波會診。會診後醫生認為劉曉波的病情發展太快，肝功能變差，所以決定暫停藥物治療。

與劉曉波相識、現居於美國的楊建利在twitter上透露，劉曉波有嚴重腹積水、腎臟也受到影響，美國政府一方面等待中國官方正式確認專家可以赴華，同時正準備有關團隊，時間十分緊迫。

另外，再有劉曉波的近照曝光，劉曉波與妻子劉霞站着對望的合照，劉比以前瘦弱。


劉曉波之友野渡在twitter上分享劉曉波新的照片時，留言道：「生死相依！從2008年劉曉波被抓以來，這是他們最近的距離，幾乎是以生命換一場相依相偎。」

最後修改時間: 2017-07-06 17:51:59

【劉曉波肝癌】身體受不了要停藥 港專家：生命或以日計算

【新增動新聞】
患末期肝癌的諾貝爾和平獎得主劉曉波，其家屬指劉的情況昨急轉直下，承受不了治療，已停用所有抗癌藥，更稱「我們可能就要失去曉波了」。有臨床腫瘤科專科醫生表示，以同類型的末期肝癌病人而論，停藥除了反映病人的身體已經承受不住藥物反應，也可能代表藥物治療已經沒有作用；一般情況下，病人的生命可以「以日計算」，期間醫生或只能夠透過藥物或非藥物形式的紓緩治療，嘗試減輕病人承受的痛楚。

正在瀋陽中國醫科大學第一附屬醫院治療的劉曉波，劉的家屬確認醫生已要求家屬24小時standby。根據最新曝光的劉曉波近照，劉曉波與妻子劉霞站着對望，劉比以前更瘦。