- #46 [David14], 24-04-12 11:06上兩位師兄所講,有經驗嘅師傅甚至電子工程師將一個普通或二手唱盤翻身或修復太好太好,但係我想請問現在還有唱盤達人幫人修復改善唱盤嘅師傅嗎?
- #45 [hahayanyan], 24-04-11 20:54回想起四五年前玩過一部luxman
跟住同我工作嘅電子工程師教我一步一步咁將the speed controller 修復
Need to change capacitor, some diode and transistor and some vr
嘩嗰種穩定同埋順暢真係唔講得少, 又好玩又平又有得學習, 難怪 這個luxman 在這些日本 什麼經典唱盤係其中一個
玩這些唱盤好處係they have a service manual, which tell the user most of the critical measurements, 願意花時間去一步一步... 就會做得好好
Fun - #44 [Ck2007], 24-04-11 15:19我部二手LP12 自己另外買全新Premotic AC馬達, hkd800.
同rega planet 3應該一樣馬達 -
- #43 [kongkin55], 24-04-11 11:59最好係外置摩打,外置唱臂,夠好玩的。
- #42 [David14], 24-04-10 11:15正如黃興所講七80年代也有好多好設計唱盤直驅帶動,但都是用一種低速馬達好處是寧靜但玩咗幾十年轉速未必穩定,所以我選擇八九十年代後有附帶外置控速的一種轉盤同時又容易更換舊零件的一類
- #41 [黃思璁], 24-04-10 01:23其實買二手或全新產品,這個範圍都可以好闊。如果樓主係指7-80年代曾經是那些黑膠唱盤風靡音響黃金時代二手產品,可以說,當年確實有很多非常出色的設計,或軟盤硬盤,帶動或直驅,發燒友往往可從中領略當年設計的精髓,有些經典的設計往往影響着現代黑膠唱盤方針。如果一開始便入手現代的黑膠唱盤,很可能便會錯過當年一些很有趣、又很好玩的設計。
不過壞處是,已經停產的產品,
找尋原廠替換零件應該非常困難,尤其是較多電子(石英)控速、較多自動裝置的直驅唱盤,經過幾十年歲月摧殘,穩定性很可能出現一些問題,未必有原廠零件可以完全修復,購買時可能需要有少少心理準備 - #40 [fotheringay], 24-04-09 19:27David,
一定有機會。
其他同路人也會。 - #39 [fotheringay], 24-04-09 19:23David,
一定有機會。
其他同路人也會。 - #38 [David14], 24-04-09 17:18Best wishes to you Fotheringay兄 希望你多點分享黑膠樂趣和技術交流
- #37 [八達通], 24-04-09 15:18要穩定轉速準確只能DD了
最後修改時間: 2024-04-09 15:20:04 - #36 [fotheringay], 24-04-09 15:12@David14,
I wish you all the best with your hunting.
I am really looking forwards to seeing your new deck and hopefully you could share with us. - #35 [fotheringay], 24-04-09 15:07Haha,
I think at this stage of my life I will slow down a little bit. I still have 4 decks and it may already be more than enough.
To answer your question I will keep the AR deck because it was the father of all Thorens, Linn, many other 3-point springs deck like my Ariston I am using at the moment.
Linn LP 12 and because I have so much fond memory.
Last but least the Lenco GL75 as I had done so many crazy DIY jobs with this idle deck and it will never disappoint. - #34 [David14], 24-04-09 12:22Gatherings兄所言有見地 外表觀感美也只是行銷手段 國品牌所產生嘅設計加些小生意或配件上改變少少物料就買到天價’ 說回正題我覺得唱盤第一要求穩定轉速準確就是 至於軟硬問題 軟出來的聲音比較有音樂感空氣感 至於硬盤聲音直接傳真度高也各有所好 老實講30 K盤加臂也只是入坑仲未連唱頭
- #33 [hahayanyan], 24-04-09 06:21Chi hing
唱盤真係好好玩嘅
我玩嗰啲hkd 幾千蚊嘅已經好開心...
I love My cheap jvc Kenwood and Dual Direct drive very much too
I still keeping my first turntable from teenager which is a thorens 316
If u going to keep 2 from the past or 3.. Which 2 or 3?
Me. I would keep a lenco 75, a jvc Tt81 and not sure which belt drive I should keep
最後修改時間: 2024-04-09 06:25:10 - #32 [fotheringay], 24-04-09 06:04Just browsing through the thread of "大家的LP系統 " and I found my old post from 2008.
Here are some of my early decks I owned from the past...................
Also, my user names had been Naim-Man, chinainnam,..............
最後修改時間: 2024-04-09 06:13:01 - #31 [hahayanyan], 24-04-09 05:05Yoyoyo
好奇怪的 in this 2nd hand hifi market at hk I came across
完美主義... 唔知點解有人買二手要求同埋新機嘅一樣 or 差不多.
關於重同輕.. Rega and linn is kind of light
Somw Upper model of Micro and Nottingham table is heavy
Some may only believe in heavy
I trend to light weight design
外表的美感...
Some feel the Linn is super pretty
Sone prefer Oracle Delph
2 kind of beauty
Or B&o type
I like them all, 30K.. I can get one each haha
Vintage, some may only Find preferece from a Garrard or Thorens Idler table, I do want a td124
Tough choice.. As many really have quite many choices
From a vintage AR table to linn to oracle, to thorens, new technics..
Mid range Micro or Luxman oEM by micro..
Nottingham..
Some German made..
If I only have space for one table
I goes for the look, a look which makee feel so nice..
Close our eye.. Each one fo them if set up correctly .. They all sound decent
For 30K..i would get 2 of space allowed
One belt one DD
Or one Belt and one idler
Or with a bit. Of luck 30k may get an old Audiolabor Brinkmann, quite a clever design
Yoyo
Haha
最後修改時間: 2024-04-09 05:12:03 - #30 [fotheringay], 24-04-09 04:29
@CS168,
You are welcome and please accept my sincere apology if I have offended any one here by my alternative view. Or, if I am considered to have hijacked this thread.
Please allow my last post here and I do hope it could help in any ways.
If not, I do wish you enjoy the music.
- #29 [CS168], 24-04-09 00:02#28.
感激 fotheringay hing 用上寶貴時間制作歌曲及影片,
給大家共賞 ^^" - #28 [fotheringay], 24-04-08 23:42
完美主義?
其實我哋講緊只不過是一件物品,若談論consumer psychology 還可,完美主義是否會demean 那享受過程呢?
說過選擇消費品是很個人,就算用超級電腦來計算也不能比出結果。
我哋只可供個人經驗作為參考,只是參考不是提供選擇或左右選購。
30 k是否有好多choices,可能亦也許不能。當樓主繼續研究下去可能以無選擇,一輪之後主觀及客觀分析已經改變了。
我一向主張Audio-Visual嘅presentation, 可能因為我喜愛攝影及電影,再加上我已失聰,聴感只有40%, 我現在享受不單是音樂,更多的是手拿著唱片回憶第一次買下的回憶及其他視覺上的stimulation。
重或輕?所指唱盤設計?我真係無這方面經驗,故無法回答。不過慨然有不同嘅設計,即是有分別,但是否一定要做選擇呢,或有某取向?
你最後那一句是比which audience? Perhaps the ultimate answer.
最後修改時間: 2024-04-08 23:43:49 - #27 [CS168], 24-04-08 22:16#26.
>>> 感觀視覺與美感絶對影响一位歌手及音响器材評分,
這是無可否認,亦會加分,...................... - 下一頁 (2 of 4)
- 返回 ...