- #22 [jefftse], 08-08-08 22:20I wouldn't call this Hifi rack as it's obvously just a common rack with 4 spikes!
- #23 [拉登超聯], 08-08-09 17:51Hi!! jefftse呢個似不似Hifi rack
- #24 [拉登超聯], 08-08-09 17:51Hi!! jefftse呢個似不似Hifi rack
-
- #25 [拉登超聯], 08-08-09 17:53Hi!! jefftse呢個似不似Hifi rack
- #26 [jefftse], 08-08-09 22:34拉登hing,
Those 3 examples are just TV/VCR racks right? Your first one is much better looking! Price wise I think you have a winner because although not exactly for Hifi it does looks pretty good and with cable mgt system. Not every Hifi need a expensive hifi rack right?
Minimum I think Hifi rack need these 3 conditions:
1. Isolation/Decoupling feet
2. Layer by layer isolation/damping
3. Each layer is made of vibration damped material. Glass even very thick one are not good vibration damping material.
There is one example below:
http://www.grandprixaudio.com/idx_design_rea.php - #27 [拉登超聯], 08-08-10 04:55嘩!好靚呀請問呢個牌子Grand Prix Audio's conclusions
機架有無去風洞測試你家中是不是用呢個牌子架
不過價錢唔仿平貴係牌子及小小花巧大約幾錢?
無論如何多謝你提拱資料我會將資料給大陸廠商作參考
遲D睇有無類似機架出
如有類似靚機架資料多謝提拱謝謝jefftse! - #28 [拉登超聯], 08-08-10 05:20Hi!! jefftse呢個似不似Hifi rack
- #29 [拉登超聯], 08-08-10 05:22
- #30 [拉登超聯], 08-08-10 05:24Hi!! jefftse呢個似不似Hifi rack
- #31 [jefftse], 08-08-10 13:37Grandprix 太貴!
動不動幾萬,買股票好過,何況防震用牆架加其他方法一樣效果好!不過我美國的朋友都是用它,效果自已上代理試.
Spider有大陸出的,除了方便樣簡潔沒有特別 - #32 [草草迷宮], 08-08-10 16:44CKL2 hing
呢隻架另有一吋粗的version,請問會唔會效果好D? - #33 [CKL2], 08-08-11 08:46Hi "草草迷宮",
The black version is more 粗 than the silver version. I heard that the black version is a very good buy. - #34 [jumbo], 08-08-28 00:02Where can I buy the rack, it shows in the picture.
- #35 [jefftse], 08-08-28 02:12Looks like those european furniture cabinet rather than hifi rack but it's difficult to tell from this picture.
- #36 [R33waifu], 08-08-28 14:33Where can I buy the rack, it shows in the picture.
_________________________________________________________
Which is USM system. www.usm.com
distubutor: EGI.www.egi.com.hk
showroom: Shop A, Valley Centre, 80-82 Morrison Hill Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong.
tel: 2838 2380 - #37 [Go4WAR], 08-08-28 15:14如果套機幾十萬但用超低價機架,我覺得出唔盡套機既聲,玩hifi都係果句,好聲就一定貴,貴就唔一定好聲,冇奇跡,只有賣藥。
- #38 [davidcapman], 08-08-28 22:43好聲就一定貴,貴就唔一定好聲.X2
- #39 [pilotrol], 08-08-28 23:34使用Hi-Fi架的原因只是因為地方有限,並希望可以把器材安放得齊整一點。現時大部份器材架的設計主要是想盡辦法去消除諧震。不過物理定律告知我們所有架只要越高就越容易使諧震的震動力加強。事實上把器材放在地面上比把器材放於高架上更能減低諧震。如你想買一個貴價的Hi-Fi架只是希望「消震」,我認為最便宜又最有效率的方法還是把器材放在地上,而不是無謂花錢去買Hi-Fi架。
不過是否把所有諧震都消去就一定是最好呢?玩音響的經驗得知如果我們可以控制器材諧震是可以輕微改變器材得播放出來的聲音質感的。例如放一些較軟的物料乘放器材,器材播放出來的聲音質感會軟慢和較柔,如放一些較硬的東西乘放器材,器材播放出來的聲音質感會較快和較緊。問題是我們是否懂得利用正確的物料和方法去控制諧震,事實上只需要有基本物理常識己可以用很便宜的價錢己經可以造出控制諧震的東西。相信學懂如何運用經驗和教聲技巧比只懂買貴東西重要。
事實上好聲未必一定要貴,貴也未必一定好聲。最重要還是知道自己在做甚蔗M想要甚翩C - #40 [EV910], 08-08-29 10:00好聲就一定貴,貴就唔一定好聲.X 3
- #41 [jumbo], 08-08-29 10:35R33waifu兄, 謝謝!!
朋友是用來做飾櫃, 他已聯絡此鋪, 價錢很貴. 想請問各位師兄, soulution是否覺得此架好聲, 陳列室及展覽時都使用?
- 下一頁 (2 of 4)
- 返回 ...